Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-25 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
Very nice, +1 Kind regards, Joachim On 01/20/2011 06:31 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Andrea Aime mailto:andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it>> wrote: Hi, the work we were talking about in the "rendering transformed data" thread one month ago has evolved int

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-24 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Cool, yeah then a slight modification to FeatureTypeStyleBinding should do it. Feel free to open a jira if you wish and I can try to get to it when i can. I don't think it should hold up the proposal in any way. On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:49 PM

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-24 Thread Andrea Aime
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Andrea Aime > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Jody Garnett >> wrote: >> > This look a very well thought out and detailed proposal; you have >> > answered a >> > couple of my questions/confu

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-24 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Jody Garnett > wrote: > > This look a very well thought out and detailed proposal; you have > answered a > > couple of my questions/confusions on IRC. > > So a big +1 for the proposal. > > A couple questions ar

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-24 Thread Andrea Aime
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > This look a very well thought out and detailed proposal; you have answered a > couple of my questions/confusions on IRC. > So a big +1 for the proposal. > A couple questions around the edges; how well does this play with: > - SLDParser / Encod

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-24 Thread Jody Garnett
This look a very well thought out and detailed proposal; you have answered a couple of my questions/confusions on IRC. So a big +1 for the proposal. A couple questions around the edges; how well does this play with: - SLDParser / Encoder (you do note that work is required) - Justin's recent SE w

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-21 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > >> Great work indeed! Very impressive and well designed. Big +1 here. However >> as a rendering/styling/etc... novice I do have some basic api questions. >> >> Excuse my ignorance b

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-21 Thread Andrea Aime
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Great work indeed! Very impressive and well designed. Big +1 here. However > as a rendering/styling/etc... novice I do have some basic api questions. > > Excuse my ignorance but in the RenderingTranformation and RenderingProcess > interfa

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-21 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Great work indeed! Very impressive and well designed. Big +1 here. However as a rendering/styling/etc... novice I do have some basic api questions. Excuse my ignorance but in the RenderingTranformation and RenderingProcess interfaces why do the invertQuery methods meant for vector data take a Grid

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-21 Thread Andrea Aime
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Andrea Aime > wrote: > >> Hi, >> the work we were talking about in the "rendering transformed data" thread >> one month ago has evolved into a patch and a proposal (as anticipated). >> >> The proposal is here,

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-21 Thread christian . mueller
Wow, really cool, +1 Quoting Michael Bedward : > +1 > > This is really impressive Andrea. > > Michael > > On 21 January 2011 04:31, Andrea Aime wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Andrea Aime >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> the work we were talking about in the "rendering transformed data" thr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-21 Thread Roy Braam
transformations: proposal and patch ready +1 This is really impressive Andrea. Michael On 21 January 2011 04:31, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Andrea Aime > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> the work we were talking about in the &qu

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-20 Thread Michael Bedward
+1 This is really impressive Andrea. Michael On 21 January 2011 04:31, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Andrea Aime > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> the work we were talking about in the "rendering transformed data" thread >> one month ago has evolved into a patch and a proposal (as

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-20 Thread Andrea Aime
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > the work we were talking about in the "rendering transformed data" thread > one month ago has evolved into a patch and a proposal (as anticipated). > > The proposal is here, along with examples of what one can do with dynamic > calls to p

[Geotools-devel] Rendering transformations: proposal and patch ready

2011-01-20 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, the work we were talking about in the "rendering transformed data" thread one month ago has evolved into a patch and a proposal (as anticipated). The proposal is here, along with examples of what one can do with dynamic calls to processes from the SLD: You can find the full patch here as well