On 20/05/2010, at 6:42 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> So at the end of the day we want the rescaling visitor to do
>> everything it can prior to letting the renderer at it. Question. Can
>> the rescale visitor inject a function expression around entries in
>> order to accomplish a conversion?
>
> Why a
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> Otherwise we have to scrap the rescaling visitor and rebuild the
>> uom -> px logic all in the SLDStyleFactory and also kiss goodbye
>> the ability to automatically figure out the rendering meta-buffer
>> when doing queries.
>>
>> So... what about having the rescale
On 20/05/2010, at 5:32 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> On 20/05/2010, at 4:57 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>>> Eh, it might get tricky as we have two sources of uom
>>> specification, the literal itself, but also the symbolizer one. I
>>> guess the local one would win.
>>> Anyone i
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> On 20/05/2010, at 4:57 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
>> Eh, it might get tricky as we have two sources of uom
>> specification, the literal itself, but also the symbolizer one. I
>> guess the local one would win.
>>
>> Anyone interested in cooking up a patch?
>
> Pick me pi
On 20/05/2010, at 4:57 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Eh, it might get tricky as we have two sources of uom specification,
> the literal itself, but also the symbolizer one. I guess the local
> one would win.
>
> Anyone interested in cooking up a patch?
Pick me pick me! After all I failed at applying
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>>> By my reading, the UomRescalingVisitor doesn't handle this
>>> option. (And it seems like fully supporting this via a visitor
>>> will be a problem; with weird enough filter functions in a
>>> parameter the "px" suffix might appear and disappear for
>>> different featu
