Re: [Geotools-devel] [jira] Resolved: (GEOT-3229) Build broken by bad docs geotools.version

2010-08-01 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Oh, now I understand. My bad. The 2.7-M2 is never set as an artifact version, you are only using it for documentation. Could you use a different property name to geotools.version, to avoid confusion? (As we use geotools.version elsewhere.) And it might also be a good idea to set the artifact ve

Re: [Geotools-devel] [jira] Resolved: (GEOT-3229) Build broken by bad docs geotools.version

2010-08-01 Thread Jody Garnett
Have a look. The pom.xml uses 2.7-SNAPSHOT the docs need to refer to 2.7-M3 to reflect the current release. They also contain instructions on how to make use of 2.7-SNAPSHOT (for the brave). The earlier mistake you reported was caused when merging doc changes from the tag back to trunk. Jody

Re: [Geotools-devel] [jira] Resolved: (GEOT-3229) Build broken by bad docs geotools.version

2010-08-01 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > On 02/08/10 13:34, Jody Garnett (JIRA) wrote: >> Give that a go; the idea is that the docs will reference 2.7-M2 as the >> stable release until next time. > > Jody, I don't like this. It makes trunk depend on a tag. This breaks the > separation of concerns and gi

Re: [Geotools-devel] [jira] Resolved: (GEOT-3229) Build broken by bad docs geotools.version

2010-08-01 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 02/08/10 13:34, Jody Garnett (JIRA) wrote: > Give that a go; the idea is that the docs will reference 2.7-M2 as the stable > release until next time. Jody, I don't like this. It makes trunk depend on a tag. This breaks the separation of concerns and gives us another thing that has to be updat