Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.3 + expression

2006-09-17 Thread Jody Garnett
Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> Think about DataStore use of Filter >> example: FeatureSource.getFeatures( Filter ) >> Recommendation: set up new method getFilter( Filter ) >> Result: I will try this tonight on the train >> >> > Not sure i understand getFilter( Filter ), do you mean getFeatur

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.3 + expression

2006-09-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> Think about Style use of Expression >> example: LineSymbolizer.setWidth( Expression width ); >> Recommendation: Style really comes down to Corey and if we have >> time/ability to clean things up w/ respect to the SLD 1.1 baseline >> Result: wait for next relea

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.3 + expression

2006-09-17 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Jody Garnett wrote: > Yes that is good, > > Thanks for buckling down and thinking about what we need to deprecate > for the final 2.3.0 release. > > If I had my thinking cap on I would ask that we: > > Think about DataStore use of Filter > example: FeatureSource.getFeatures( Filter ) > Reco

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.3 + expression

2006-09-17 Thread Jody Garnett
Yes that is good, Thanks for buckling down and thinking about what we need to deprecate for the final 2.3.0 release. If I had my thinking cap on I would ask that we: Think about DataStore use of Filter example: FeatureSource.getFeatures( Filter ) Recommendation: set up new method getFilter

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.3 + expression

2006-09-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Hi all, > > There was some expression classes that moved in the change over to > geoapi interfaces which of course is not backward compatable, so > geoserver and udig break when they switch over. > > We can move them back, but then geoserver wcs and 1.5.x branches

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.3 + expression

2006-09-17 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Also, for 2.3 we need to deprecate all the filter interfaces in api. Jody you are the module maintainer, is that cool? -Justin Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Hi all, > > There was some expression classes that moved in the change over to > geoapi interfaces which of course is not backward compatable

[Geotools-devel] 2.3 + expression

2006-09-17 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi all, There was some expression classes that moved in the change over to geoapi interfaces which of course is not backward compatable, so geoserver and udig break when they switch over. We can move them back, but then geoserver wcs and 1.5.x branches break as they already dealt with the breakag