Ciao Andrea,
Well it looks like i can go ahead so I will probably tag the release
sometime today and push out artifacts etc... tomorrow.
-Justin
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:18 AM, andrea antonello <
andrea.antone...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, it is there, thanks. So +1 from me also :)
>
> Justin, an
tcase
> necessary beforehand concerning this constructor adding ticket?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> João
>
>
> - Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
> Von: Justin Deoliveira
> Gesendet: 10.05.11 16:15 Uhr
> An: Geotools-Devel list
> Betreff: [Geotools-devel] 2.7.1 releas
Ok, it is there, thanks. So +1 from me also :)
Justin, any idea about when you will do this? It would give me a way
to better organize the jgrasstools release.
Thanks,
Andrea
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> We will get it onto the 2.7.x branch; and it will be tagged wit
We will get it onto the 2.7.x branch; and it will be tagged with the release of
2.7.1 when Justin hits the button.
Consider it a race :-) Drop by IRC if you need a hand.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wednesday, 11 May 2011 at 5:30 PM, andrea antonello wrote:
> I think we are all good; there a are a coup
> I think we are all good; there a are a couple of plugins moving to supported
> status that may want to hold up the train? We will see what they say...
Indeed, I realized that for the jgrasstools release I will badly need
the grassraster plugin to be part of this release, so this would be
extreme
+1 from my end
--
Jody Garnett
On Wednesday, 11 May 2011 at 7:59 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I think we are all good; there a are a couple of plugins moving to supported
> status that may want to hold up the train? We will see what they say...
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On Wednesday, 11 May 20
I think we are all good; there a are a couple of plugins moving to supported
status that may want to hold up the train? We will see what they say...
--
Jody Garnett
On Wednesday, 11 May 2011 at 12:36 AM, christian.muel...@nvoe.at wrote:
> +1, especially because I have a user waiting for this
>
+1, especially because I have a user waiting for this
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3578
to occur in geoserver.
Quoting Justin Deoliveira :
> Hi all,
>
> The geoserver folks are planning on releasing 2.1.0 this week so that brings
> up the question of whether we should release 2.7.1. Any
+1
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Founder
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 962313
mob: +39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
Hi all,
The geoserver folks are planning on releasing 2.1.0 this week so that brings
up the question of whether we should release 2.7.1. Any objections to
putting out 2.7.1 this week as well?
-Justin
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial
Ok, 2.7.0.1 up on sourceforge and I have updated
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.7.0
-Justin
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 09:55 +1000, Jody Garnett wrote:
> > Hey Justin.
> >
> >
> > How about this ... can we release a 2.7.0.1
Sorry, also deployed in the maven repos as well.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Ok, 2.7.0.1 up on sourceforge and I have updated
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/2.7.0
>
> -Justin
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Gabriel Roldán wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 09:55 +1000, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Hey Justin.
>
>
> How about this ... can we release a 2.7.0.1 to maven and tag.
+1
>
>
> And then update the 2.7.0 download page to indicate that a 2.7.0.1
> release is available in maven containing a few bug fixes for GeoServer
>
Hey Justin.
How about this ... can we release a 2.7.0.1 to maven and tag.
And then update the 2.7.0 download page to indicate that a 2.7.0.1 release is
available in maven containing a few bug fixes for GeoServer 2.1 or whatever.
And yes I will write up a proposal page for dropping the "2"
Hi all,
I can't remember if a formal thread was started for this but Jody hinted at
it in his "GeoTools 3" email.
Basically geoserver needs to put out another quick release candidate (RC4)
that requires some geotools fixes post 2.7.0. The question is how do people
feel about 2.7.1 so soon after 2
15 matches
Mail list logo
