Andrea Aime ha scritto:
Doh, during the holiday I coded the builder I was talking about almost
fully (it just misses support for text and raster symbolizers).
I don't have the code handy right now but I'll post it tomorrow or
Monday. Where is yours so that I can have a look at it?
Here is the
It is called SLDContentManager; and SLDs (and SLD which was already
ported to GeoTools); and I found a few other helper methods. I was
bundling them all into SLDContentManager (in uDig
net.refractions.udig.style.sld plugin). Mostly this was clean up;
documentation; test case work. But as I
That is fun; post it when you get a chance - I am mostly interested in
ensuring I only have one to worry about (and that it has good test
coverage).
Glad you enjoyed your holiday,
Jody
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>>
>> Hi Andrea:
>>
>> A small up
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Hi Andrea:
>
> A small update on this one - I have focused the last week on improving
> the uDig style editing story. And have turned up not one; not two; but
> three helper classes all of which fall into the roll of a "Builder" for
> style.
>
> I am collapsing them
Hi Andrea:
A small update on this one - I have focused the last week on improving
the uDig style editing story. And have turned up not one; not two; but
three helper classes all of which fall into the roll of a "Builder"
for style.
I am collapsing them all into one right now; now while it i
+1, I think it is a great idea, something I have thought of before as
well. Currently #2 on my builder list right after a concise geometry
builder :).
-Justin
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi all,
> many years ago pissed off by how hard it was to build
> styles with code I created the StyleBuilder we ha
Ciao Andrea,
don't worry, I don't think you should create a proposal for this.
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Owner - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 058
Simone Giannecchini ha scritto:
> +1, just out of curiosity are you going to build a fully fledged
> proposal for this?
For a 4 classes builder? Hmmm... I did not think I would need to,
but if you really want, I'll make one :)
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert ser
+1 from me Andrea
I would vote +10 if it was allowed :-)
This sounds so good and it will be taken up instantly by many users.
LIke Jody, I think the chaining of methods is ideal here.
Michael
--
Crystal Reports - New Fr
+1, just out of curiosity are you going to build a fully fledged
proposal for this?
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Owner - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +3
+1 for that. Looking at the mailing lists, I got a little bit of a "dark
feeling" about the SLD/Styling complex. Since I know that this is the future
for many departments of my biggest customer I would really appreciate that.
As a matter of fact, I have to convince many users to use SLDs in
co
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Yes you are :-) Now if we can back in onto the nice clear stylefactory
> interface we have going it should be a clear split :-)
sounds good to me, will this allow use to build in sld 1.3 support aswell?
I'm +1 either way.
Ian
--
Yes you are :-) Now if we can back in onto the nice clear stylefactory
interface we have going it should be a clear split :-)
I especially like the support for "chaining" methods together.
In addition to the existing StyleBuilder it would be good if the
current SLD support class can be merged int
Hi all,
many years ago pissed off by how hard it was to build
styles with code I created the StyleBuilder we have today...
shame on me :)
Now, I would like to propose a new style builder to replace
that old clunky one. I would like it to be very compact,
chock full of default behavior, and fluent.
14 matches
Mail list logo
