Re: [Geotools-devel] About Java 6 on trunk

2011-06-16 Thread christian . mueller
Added a patch for the developer guide to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3654 Can somebody review. The issue has no watchers and no assignee, so I have to broadcast on the list. Cheers Christian This message was sent

Re: [Geotools-devel] About Java 6 on trunk

2011-06-16 Thread Jody Garnett
If it is an admin item such as a proposal we can add the pmc members. I put a list you can cut and paste in the developers guide to help with this. I updated the proposal with a +1 and also to link to your issue above. Jody On 16/06/2011, at 8:49 PM, christian.muel...@nvoe.at wrote:

Re: [Geotools-devel] About Java 6 on trunk

2011-06-16 Thread christian . mueller
Zitat von Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com: If it is an admin item such as a proposal we can add the pmc members. I put a list you can cut and paste in the developers guide to help with this. AFAIK I do not have the access rights to add watchers. Christian I updated the proposal

[Geotools-devel] About Java 6 on trunk

2011-06-15 Thread christian . mueller
Short question because I am unsure. Can I use Java 6 for development on geoserver trunk ? Now I work with Java 5 and in the meantime I hate the class IOExpression NOT having a constructor where I can pass an Exception as an argument. What about geotools ? I have so many places where I use

Re: [Geotools-devel] About Java 6 on trunk

2011-06-15 Thread Jody Garnett
I second Andrea. I set up a proposal so we could see what was needed for the GeoTools side. Once there are a few more names next to the tasks section we should be able to go ahead. For reference here is the list of tasks: aa: check build in Java 6 an apply eventual patches Update pom to

Re: [Geotools-devel] About Java 6 on trunk

2011-06-15 Thread Jody Garnett
Good point about the hudson builds; is there anything else we are missing? Updated Proposal page: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Java+6 -- Jody Garnett On Thursday, 16 June 2011 at 1:45 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: I second Andrea. I set up a proposal so we could see what was