James Macgill wrote:
In addition to being wrong, it does not scale down. As for the change of
tag line etc should talk to James.
If you are referring to the 'The open source...' vs 'An open source'
I'm not the guy to talk to.
For years and years it was 'An' but someone (I think it may e
> In addition to being wrong, it does not scale down. As for the change of
> tag line etc should talk to James.
If you are referring to the 'The open source...' vs 'An open source'
I'm not the guy to talk to.
For years and years it was 'An' but someone (I think it may even have
been you Jody ;)
Adrian Custer wrote:
If we remove the "N" can we keep the earth in the expected orientation?
Only if you have *no* ambition towards subverting the dominant
paradigm. ;-)
lol
You can, of course, do whatever you please. Removing the N is actually a
good solution, since the N would ind
Adrian Custer wrote:
Hey all,
When I got Map pane working a week ago and it allowed me to *rotate* the
map, I finally transcended a pet peeve which had been irking me since
the days of arcview 2.0. Until this past week, there seemed no point in
having a north arrow in a GIS software package whe
Hey all,
When I got Map pane working a week ago and it allowed me to *rotate* the
map, I finally transcended a pet peeve which had been irking me since
the days of arcview 2.0. Until this past week, there seemed no point in
having a north arrow in a GIS software package when there was no way to
ch
