Re: [Geotools-devel] An eventual move to git: please discuss

2012-01-22 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Not any more: I got rid of the nasty cross-project external. GS app-schema-test now gets its test dependencies from maven artifacts, as it should. On 22/01/12 05:00, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Yeah, that would solve the one external from web/app, but i think app-schema > uses some externals lin

Re: [Geotools-devel] An eventual move to git: please discuss

2012-01-22 Thread Jody Garnett
> Oh, is that mailing list still in use? I don't think I'm subscribed to it > anymore > > > Yep. > - The PSC needs to expect a greater workload as there there is no longer an > attitude of taking part in a project; only submitting a pull request and > walking away > > To be blunt, what's t

Re: [Geotools-devel] An eventual move to git: please discuss

2012-01-22 Thread Andrea Aime
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > I recently cut and pasted an IRC chat on #geotools over to the > geotools-administraiton list. It consisted of a couple of developers being > shocked we still used subversion. > Oh, is that mailing list still in use? I don't think I'm subsc

Re: [Geotools-devel] An eventual move to git: please discuss

2012-01-21 Thread Jody Garnett
I recently cut and pasted an IRC chat on #geotools over to the geotools-administraiton list. It consisted of a couple of developers being shocked we still used subversion. - Enough said on that front; >From the uDig experience: - it is not enough to move to git -> you must move to git hub to

Re: [Geotools-devel] An eventual move to git: please discuss

2012-01-21 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Justin Deoliveira > wrote: > >> Thanks for refreshing the topic Andrea. I too agree that the move to git >> is eventually inevitable and coming sooner rather than later. Some random >> thoughts. >> >> I think

Re: [Geotools-devel] An eventual move to git: please discuss

2012-01-21 Thread Andrea Aime
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Thanks for refreshing the topic Andrea. I too agree that the move to git > is eventually inevitable and coming sooner rather than later. Some random > thoughts. > > I think it will be key to have some good docs in the developer guide abou

Re: [Geotools-devel] An eventual move to git: please discuss

2012-01-21 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Thanks for refreshing the topic Andrea. I too agree that the move to git is eventually inevitable and coming sooner rather than later. Some random thoughts. I think it will be key to have some good docs in the developer guide about git. Nothing too crazy, but a quick little reference guide for git

[Geotools-devel] An eventual move to git: please discuss

2012-01-21 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, the eventual move of GeoTools from svn to git is looking to me more and more like the move to java 6: something eventually unavoidable, but for which we have to pick a good timing. For the Java 6 we run a periodic discussion a few times (I think I've sent mails to check if the timing was good