+1, This would be great. At the moment I simply ignore IBM/OpenJDK
builds, its like playing Russian roulette. The builds have no chance
to succeed.
Quoting Ben Caradoc-Davies :
> Aieee. Have a look at gt-xsd-core Schemas:114.
>
> HashSet. Platform randomisation, not deterministic behaviour a
See open source is a two step process: complain first and then fix :-)
Step 2 is always the hardest.
Checking your fix now.
Jody
On 15/06/2010, at 1:02 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Aieee. Have a look at gt-xsd-core Schemas:114.
>
> HashSet. Platform randomisation, not deterministic behaviou
Aieee. Have a look at gt-xsd-core Schemas:114.
HashSet. Platform randomisation, not deterministic behaviour across
platforms.
I now promise to complete my rant "HashMap Considered Harmful" and to
send it to this list. This will be followed by my proposal for the Great
HashMap Purge of 2010.
O
Just verified on a windows machine with no local changes.
Jody
On 15/06/2010, at 12:35 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> [Switched to the dev list]
>
> Ooh, this might be a bad test. I assumed that the app-schema schema is first
> in the list, as the schemas are now supposed to be sorted in depen
[Switched to the dev list]
Ooh, this might be a bad test. I assumed that the app-schema schema is
first in the list, as the schemas are now supposed to be sorted in
dependency order (app-schema -> GML -> XS) since Justin made it stable.
But I do not know the contract here, as it is undocumented
