On Friday 12 December 2008 18:26:46 Matthias Basler wrote:
> Mauricio wrote:
> > good, I grab these options
> > * ECQL: Andrea, Mauricio
> > * CQL+: Jody
> > * TXTQL: Adrian
>
> In case my opinion matters: I like "ECQL" most, "TXTQL" is too hard to
> pronounce.
Hello Mattias, It is a good point.
t
Mauricio wrote:
> good, I grab these options
> * ECQL: Andrea, Mauricio
> * CQL+: Jody
> * TXTQL: Adrian
In case my opinion matters: I like "ECQL" most, "TXTQL" is too hard to
pronounce.
--
Matthias Basler
matthiasbas...@earthflight.org
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Mauricio Pazos ha scritto:
>>
>> Adrian, What do you think about the new options?.
Hmm, I must have missed a round. Mauricio, you don't want my opinion on
something this trivial. Pick one, do a quick google search on it to see
if our users will be able to find our docs if we
Mauricio Pazos ha scritto:
> On Thursday 11 December 2008 01:44:32 Jody Garnett wrote:
>> Mauricio Pazos wrote:
>>> I am with Andrea Aime proposal: "ECQL"
>> That is cool - some reference to CQL is good ... CQL+ :-)
>>
>> That said we may wish to propose the FeatureID extensions to CQL as part
>> o
On Thursday 11 December 2008 01:44:32 Jody Garnett wrote:
> Mauricio Pazos wrote:
> > I am with Andrea Aime proposal: "ECQL"
>
> That is cool - some reference to CQL is good ... CQL+ :-)
>
> That said we may wish to propose the FeatureID extensions to CQL as part
> of the next revision of CSW speci
Mauricio Pazos wrote:
> I am with Andrea Aime proposal: "ECQL"
That is cool - some reference to CQL is good ... CQL+ :-)
That said we may wish to propose the FeatureID extensions to CQL as part
of the next revision of CSW specification (which defined CQL).
Jody
-
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 16:22:21 you wrote:
> Hi Andrea, let me change the subject. In think it is an important.
>
> > Or considering that TXT is really a CQL extension (every CQL statement
> > is a valid TXT statement as well afaik) one could call it ECQL
> > (following the lead of wkb and e
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 15:35:48 Adrian Custer wrote:
> Hey Mauricio,
>
> Fantastic work on your language
Our Language! We have done this language for the GIS community. (and thanks :)
)
> ---sounds like a big effort and I'm glad
> to think it will pay off.
>
> 'Tis late in the game to bring
