Re: [Geotools-devel] Default java.awt.headless to true in top-level pom?

2016-07-26 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Sorry, I changed interactive test profiles to set: false ! On 27/07/16 14:07, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > And I should also mention that I changed interactive test profiles to set: > > true > > Now everyone should be happy. :-) > > Kind regards, > Ben. > > On 27/07/16 14:02, Ben Caradoc-Davies

Re: [Geotools-devel] Default java.awt.headless to true in top-level pom?

2016-07-26 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
And I should also mention that I changed interactive test profiles to set: true Now everyone should be happy. :-) Kind regards, Ben. On 27/07/16 14:02, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Done. I have also updated the GeoTools jobs on ares Jenkins to remove > redundant flags. > > Kind regards, > Ben.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Default java.awt.headless to true in top-level pom?

2016-07-26 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Done. I have also updated the GeoTools jobs on ares Jenkins to remove redundant flags. Kind regards, Ben. On 26/07/16 18:43, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > And I have included -Djava.awt.headless=true in the wrapper script that > I use to drive Maven. The fact that we are both working around this >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Default java.awt.headless to true in top-level pom?

2016-07-25 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
And I have included -Djava.awt.headless=true in the wrapper script that I use to drive Maven. The fact that we are both working around this suggests to me that the GeoTools top-level pom should set this default: true If no one objects, I will change the default on master, 15.x, and 14.x. Kind

Re: [Geotools-devel] Default java.awt.headless to true in top-level pom?

2016-07-25 Thread Jody Garnett
I am fine to change the default, I have included headless in my local maven opts env variable just to keep geotools build from annoying me. -- Jody Garnett On 25 July 2016 at 14:15, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Yes. These are the reason that I did not just make the change. The only > difference

Re: [Geotools-devel] Default java.awt.headless to true in top-level pom?

2016-07-25 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Yes. These are the reason that I did not just make the change. The only difference is the need to override the default with -Djava.awt.headless=false if running interactive tests with Maven (unless some other logic is added to the pom). Those running interactive tests in Eclipse would not need

Re: [Geotools-devel] Default java.awt.headless to true in top-level pom?

2016-07-25 Thread Jody Garnett
small concern, we do have interactive tests that require GUI. I know we normally run them by hand ... -- Jody Garnett On 24 July 2016 at 13:37, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Of course I meant: "in the GeoTools top-level pom on master, 15.x, and > 14.x". > > On 25/07/16 08:33, Ben Caradoc-Davies w

Re: [Geotools-devel] Default java.awt.headless to true in top-level pom?

2016-07-24 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Of course I meant: "in the GeoTools top-level pom on master, 15.x, and 14.x". On 25/07/16 08:33, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Any objections to setting: > > true > > in the GeoTools top-level pom on master, 2.9.x, and 2.8.x? > > This change would be consistent with GeoServer and GeoWebCache, and b

[Geotools-devel] Default java.awt.headless to true in top-level pom?

2016-07-24 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Any objections to setting: true in the GeoTools top-level pom on master, 2.9.x, and 2.8.x? This change would be consistent with GeoServer and GeoWebCache, and be one less flag to remember. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Director Transient Software Limited New Zea