Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL vs CQL grammars

2019-11-06 Thread Andrea Aime
The names such as "eq" or "neq" are indeed unknown in the OGC specs... I've tried searching on the web without success too... Cheers Andrea Il mer 6 nov 2019, 06:51 Daniele Romagnoli < daniele.romagn...@geo-solutions.it> ha scritto: > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:14 PM Andrea Aime > wrote: > >

Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL vs CQL grammars

2019-11-06 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 4:14 PM Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Daniele, > I actually checked the CSW 2.0 spec and there is no trace of "eq" > either... not sure where > that came from honestly, but here at the sprint I see "eq" showing again > in the JSON > encoding of CQL so I'll ask what the deal is :-

Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL vs CQL grammars

2019-11-05 Thread Ian Turton
No idea I'm afraid but it sounds like a grammar bug. Ian On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 14:08, Daniele Romagnoli < daniele.romagn...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Hi List, > Sorry if that sounds as a silly question but why ECQL (which is an > extended version of CQL) supports a reduced grammar with respect

Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL vs CQL grammars

2019-11-05 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Daniele, I actually checked the CSW 2.0 spec and there is no trace of "eq" either... not sure where that came from honestly, but here at the sprint I see "eq" showing again in the JSON encoding of CQL so I'll ask what the deal is :-D Cheers Andrea On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 3:32 PM Daniele Romagn

Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL vs CQL grammars

2019-11-05 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Ok, thanks! Regards, Daniele On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 3:10 PM Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Daniele, > I believe "eq" is old, deprecated, thus it has been dropped > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 3:09 PM Daniele Romagnoli < > daniele.romagn...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > >> Hi List, >> Sor

Re: [Geotools-devel] ECQL vs CQL grammars

2019-11-05 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Daniele, I believe "eq" is old, deprecated, thus it has been dropped Cheers Andrea On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 3:09 PM Daniele Romagnoli < daniele.romagn...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Hi List, > Sorry if that sounds as a silly question but why ECQL (which is an > extended version of CQL) supports

[Geotools-devel] ECQL vs CQL grammars

2019-11-05 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi List, Sorry if that sounds as a silly question but why ECQL (which is an extended version of CQL) supports a reduced grammar with respect to CQL? For example, I see that CQL Grammar support '*eq*' | '*=*' | '*==*' as equality keywords https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/lib