Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> First off we have three wikis which i can infer are broken up like follows:
>
> GEOTDOC: User Guide
> GEOT: Developers Guide
> GEOTOOLS: The front end to both of the above
>
> Which I guess is not that confusing now that I have just figured it out :).
>
You got it.
> H
Yep - you caught me at my volunteer work.
I am starting to make the User Guide FeatureType / Feature /
FeatureCollection documentation in order to capture the state of play as
we transition to GeoAPI feature stuff. It also helps me get my head on
straight so I am useful when Justin asks me ques
Hmmm... I see... Well no offense to Jody but perhaps they should just
forgo the brain dump :).
-Justin
Adrian Custer wrote:
> Hey Justin,
>
> Actually, you missed one set of docs which has yet another different
> aim---the user manual that catered to the newbie. However, jody's user
> guide is g
Hey Justin,
Actually, you missed one set of docs which has yet another different
aim---the user manual that catered to the newbie. However, jody's user
guide is getting *much* better. The sections start out as a brain dump
from jody and evolve towards something much more readable/usable.
--adrian
Agreed!!
As part of my work to get complex features on trunk I would like to take
part in this as well. In general I find our geotools documentation to be
quite confusing.
First off we have three wikis which i can infer are broken up like follows:
GEOTDOC: User Guide
GEOT: Developers Guide
GEOTO
Hey Jody,
Since you are the documentation extrodinaire, I wonder if we could
schedule a short documentation sprint to cleanup the Feature docs. We
have documentation in lots of places:
Geoapi feature package
Geoapi Feature
Geoapi FeatureFactory
Geotools fe
