+1 from here
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Justin Deoliveira <
jdeol...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote:
> +1 as well.
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
> ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
>
>> +1.
>>
>> The default "filesystem" order is the worst possible case as it is (1
+1 as well.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au> wrote:
> +1.
>
> The default "filesystem" order is the worst possible case as it is (1)
> unpredictably different between machines, even with the same operating
> system, and (2) persistent, making fai
+1.
The default "filesystem" order is the worst possible case as it is (1)
unpredictably different between machines, even with the same operating
system, and (2) persistent, making failures appear permanent.
The only problem with "alphabetical" is that it will mask dependencies
between between
Hi,
with three public build servers around it has become rather complicated to
get a consistent
working build on both linux and windows, jdk 6 and jdk 7.
So I was wondering about getting at least some consistency in the test
execution order
among platforms and jdks, like it was done in GeoServer:
