Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
> Hi Robert,
>
> What version of geotools are you using?
I'm using the 2.5-M0
> Also if possible and you are not
> restricted by data licensing issues feel free to send over the gml file
> you are using.
>
Here it is :
http://www.opengis.net/gml";
Hi Robert,
What version of geotools are you using? Also if possible and you are not
restricted by data licensing issues feel free to send over the gml file
you are using.
-Justin
Robert Jacolin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to work on my indexer by using Parser and Feature but it doesn't
> work. I
Hi,
I tried to work on my indexer by using Parser and Feature but it doesn't
work. I get several exceptions very strange and an infinite loop in some
cases.
Here my code :
XMLSerializer serializer = new XMLSerializer();
FileOutputStream fos = new
FileOutputStream("c:\\t
Actually, GML2 could handle complex features just fine, just the
implementations were all built around simple features.
GML3 modularised GML, and then added a whole bunch of modules. And it
changed a few things
fromt the release:
"GML Version 3.1.0 adds new geometries, is more compliant with the
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 10:08 +0100, Robert Jacolin wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> >
> Hi,
> thank you for your answer !
> > GML3 is quite different from GML2. The changes on teh geometry elements
> > that you noted are one of differences. The feature stuff is still pre
Robert Jacolin wrote:
> For my information, can you precise this 'wack of more stuff' ? Why
> don't you use them ?
>
They support all kinds of things like associations; more complicated
topology stuff (like networks) and xml format
for coordinate reference systems and so on. GML out of the box
Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
> Hi Robert,
>
>
Hi,
thank you for your answer !
> GML3 is quite different from GML2. The changes on teh geometry elements
> that you noted are one of differences. The feature stuff is still pretty
> similar. And then there is a wack of more stuff that we don't really
Hi Robert,
GML3 is quite different from GML2. The changes on teh geometry elements
that you noted are one of differences. The feature stuff is still pretty
similar. And then there is a wack of more stuff that we don't really use.
So patching the GML2 parsing stuff is one alternative. However a fu
Hello,
currently I'm working on a project for a client where we need to work on
GML v3.
In this project, the data are stored in an eXist database. geoTools is
used to create indexes in the database by using GMLFilterDocument.
Currently, the indexes are created only for GML v2 file.
To make geo