Re: [Geotools-devel] GML V3

2007-11-15 Thread Robert Jacolin
Justin Deoliveira a écrit : > Hi Robert, > > What version of geotools are you using? I'm using the 2.5-M0 > Also if possible and you are not > restricted by data licensing issues feel free to send over the gml file > you are using. > Here it is : http://www.opengis.net/gml";

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML V3

2007-11-15 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Robert, What version of geotools are you using? Also if possible and you are not restricted by data licensing issues feel free to send over the gml file you are using. -Justin Robert Jacolin wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to work on my indexer by using Parser and Feature but it doesn't > work. I

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML V3

2007-11-15 Thread Robert Jacolin
Hi, I tried to work on my indexer by using Parser and Feature but it doesn't work. I get several exceptions very strange and an infinite loop in some cases. Here my code : XMLSerializer serializer = new XMLSerializer(); FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream("c:\\t

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML V3

2007-11-13 Thread Rob Atkinson
Actually, GML2 could handle complex features just fine, just the implementations were all built around simple features. GML3 modularised GML, and then added a whole bunch of modules. And it changed a few things fromt the release: "GML Version 3.1.0 adds new geometries, is more compliant with the

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML V3

2007-11-13 Thread Adrian Custer
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 10:08 +0100, Robert Jacolin wrote: > Justin Deoliveira a écrit : > > Hi Robert, > > > > > Hi, > thank you for your answer ! > > GML3 is quite different from GML2. The changes on teh geometry elements > > that you noted are one of differences. The feature stuff is still pre

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML V3

2007-11-13 Thread Jody Garnett
Robert Jacolin wrote: > For my information, can you precise this 'wack of more stuff' ? Why > don't you use them ? > They support all kinds of things like associations; more complicated topology stuff (like networks) and xml format for coordinate reference systems and so on. GML out of the box

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML V3

2007-11-13 Thread Robert Jacolin
Justin Deoliveira a écrit : > Hi Robert, > > Hi, thank you for your answer ! > GML3 is quite different from GML2. The changes on teh geometry elements > that you noted are one of differences. The feature stuff is still pretty > similar. And then there is a wack of more stuff that we don't really

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML V3

2007-11-12 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Robert, GML3 is quite different from GML2. The changes on teh geometry elements that you noted are one of differences. The feature stuff is still pretty similar. And then there is a wack of more stuff that we don't really use. So patching the GML2 parsing stuff is one alternative. However a fu

[Geotools-devel] GML V3

2007-11-12 Thread Robert Jacolin
Hello, currently I'm working on a project for a client where we need to work on GML v3. In this project, the data are stored in an eXist database. geoTools is used to create indexes in the database by using GMLFilterDocument. Currently, the indexes are created only for GML v2 file. To make geo