There already is a custom filter factory in app-schema to provide
namespace support. This may be a suitable extension point.
On 23/09/10 23:55, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Well I think what was meant was that app-schema datastore was going to visit
> the incoming filter and replace the property n
Actually, Ben said there is already a custom filterfactory for
app-schema. Seems like it is not going to be that hard, then.
On 23/09/10 23:55, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Well I think what was meant was that app-schema datastore was going to
visit the incoming filter and replace the property name
Well I think what was meant was that app-schema datastore was going to visit
the incoming filter and replace the property name with a custom one. THis
could be done with a custom filter factory at that level but seems a bit
overkill.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Why hac
Why hack? Pass in a different filterfactory - that is why we have factories
right!
On 23/09/2010, at 1:16 PM, Niels wrote:
> I will see how I can hack the FilterFactory to produce a different
> attributeexpression implementation for app-schema.
>
> On 23/09/10 11:12, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>
I will see how I can hack the FilterFactory to produce a different
attributeexpression implementation for app-schema.
On 23/09/10 11:12, Jody Garnett wrote:
I got stuck in a work meeting; what were the results of the IRC meeting?
Jody
On 22/09/2010, at 11:41 AM, Niels wrote:
Sounds good to m
Neils and myself chatted it out. Here is the transcript.
[7:12pm] jdeolive: hi niels_
[7:12pm] jdeolive: niels_: while we wait for others, i have a few questions
[7:12pm] niels_: okay, good idea
[7:13pm] jdeolive: ok, first question, it sounds like originally you wanted
to set up the change in be
I got stuck in a work meeting; what were the results of the IRC meeting?
Jody
On 22/09/2010, at 11:41 AM, Niels wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> On 22/09/10 04:42, Jody Garnett wrote:
>>
>> Sounds good; note that the IRC meeting may be via Skype (often seems to be
>> when chatting with CSIRO :-
Sounds good to me.
On 22/09/10 04:42, Jody Garnett wrote:
Sounds good; note that the IRC meeting may be via Skype (often seems
to be when chatting with CSIRO :-) ).
Jody
On 22/09/2010, at 2:09 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi guys,
I can stick around later for a meeting so around 9am perth
Sounds good; note that the IRC meeting may be via Skype (often seems to be when
chatting with CSIRO :-) ).
Jody
On 22/09/2010, at 2:09 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I can stick around later for a meeting so around 9am perth time should be
> fine but i can't do it today. How abou
Hi guys,
I can stick around later for a meeting so around 9am perth time should be
fine but i can't do it today. How about we do it wednesday/thursday?
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
wrote:
> Justin mailed this list at 9:18am Perth time this morning. :-)
>
>
> On 21/09/10
Justin mailed this list at 9:18am Perth time this morning. :-)
On 21/09/10 16:03, Charlier, Niels (CESRE, Kensington) wrote:
> Hmmm.. 7am would be a bit difficult for me. At earliest 8:00AM
>
> On 21/09/10 15:42, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I am going to assume your meeting was intended for geotools-de
Hmmm.. 7am would be a bit difficult for me. At earliest 8:00AM
On 21/09/10 15:42, Jody Garnett wrote:
I am going to assume your meeting was intended for geotools-devel?
Justin is in north America; so I recommend early morning (assuming it
is possible for Justin to stay up late).
-
http://www.
I am going to assume your meeting was intended for geotools-devel?
Justin is in north America; so I recommend early morning (assuming it is
possible for Justin to stay up late).
-
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?month=9&day=22&year=2010&p1=240&p2=196&p3=55&p4=-1
With that
13 matches
Mail list logo
