Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageIO MetaData: Coverage metadata level

2007-09-10 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Some answers to your questions. On 9/7/07, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In "Image I/O metadata for multidimensional coverage" document > > > > 5. ImageIO MetaData for Multidimensional Coverages overview > > --- > > In or

Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageIO MetaData: Stream metadata

2007-09-10 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Martin, Here below, some answers to part of your questions. On 9/7/07, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > General note: some nodes begin with a lower case, and some other nodes > begin with a upper case. It may be worth to clarify what is the policy > for lower/upper cases. In

Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageIO MetaData

2007-09-10 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Martin, Excuse me for my delayed reply. On 9/7/07, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Daniele Romagnoli from Geosolution recently send us a document on > Coverage I/O metadata. It sound like a very good draft to me. In the > next bunch of emails, I'm going to comment some sectio

Re: [Geotools-devel] ImageIO MetaData

2007-09-07 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Martin; one of the things we are chasing up with Raj and the OSGeo foundation is the ability to get into the process a bit more. Right now this email is interesting in a social sense (yeah something happening with image metadata, and even better you are pleased with it). But the details are

[Geotools-devel] ImageIO MetaData: Basic Stream

2007-09-07 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Page 16 introduces the concept of "Basic Stream metadata" in addition of "Stream metadata". This new metadata level is not mentionned in the introduction. Do we expect "Basic stream metadata" to be returned by the "flat" or the "smart" image reader? If they are expected to be returned by the "flat

[Geotools-devel] ImageIO MetaData: Coverage metadata level

2007-09-07 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
In "Image I/O metadata for multidimensional coverage" document > 5. ImageIO MetaData for Multidimensional Coverages overview > --- > In order to be able to describe a Multidimensional Coverage (or > ND-Coverage), we need to introduce the con

[Geotools-devel] ImageIO MetaData: on IIOMetadataFormat violations

2007-09-07 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
On page 17, we can read (talking about IIOMetadataFormat constraints): > For our purposes we will try to respect as much as possible these rules, but > we might need to > violate some of them to produce a useful metadata structure. It is worth to > point out that ImageIO > would not complain ab

[Geotools-devel] ImageIO MetaData: Stream metadata

2007-09-07 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
General note: some nodes begin with a lower case, and some other nodes begin with a upper case. It may be worth to clarify what is the policy for lower/upper cases. In "GML in JPEG 2000" specification, I have the feeling that lower case is used for attributes and upper case used for classes. Page

[Geotools-devel] ImageIO MetaData

2007-09-07 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Daniele Romagnoli from Geosolution recently send us a document on Coverage I/O metadata. It sound like a very good draft to me. In the next bunch of emails, I'm going to comment some sections. I will send separated emails for different issues in order to create distinct threads. For this email, I