Re: [Geotools-devel] JDK11 GT repackaging and the Logging utility

2018-10-25 Thread Torben Barsballe
Sure, I have no objections to something like that. I will note that we didn't see any cases where this was actually being done in the GeoTools or GeoServer codebases. Torben On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 5:09 PM Jody Garnett wrote: > Technically people can use the String approach to make loggers on a

Re: [Geotools-devel] JDK11 GT repackaging and the Logging utility

2018-10-25 Thread Jody Garnett
Technically people can use the String approach to make loggers on a specific "topic" like rendering, rather than by implementation (which is what package is documenting). Perhaps a getTopic( final String topic ) Using "topic" as "subject" could be mistaken for the "subject" class being logged. --

[Geotools-devel] JDK11 GT repackaging and the Logging utility

2018-10-25 Thread Torben Barsballe
The org.geotools.util.logging.Logging class provides two public methods to get a logger: - public static Logger getLogger(final Class classe) - public static Logger getLogger(final String name) The latter is primarily used to provide a package name manually, while the former infers the pack