Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> As with any last minute change I think we are asking for trouble :), but
> in this case the reward seems worth the risk. As long as we can throw
> out another release quickly, (or path the release) in case a serious
> regression does pop up I see no issue.
I gues
Simone Giannecchini ha scritto:
> Ciao Andrea,
> looked it up quickly, sounds more than reasonable to me.
> I would go ahead and apply it on as many branch as you can.
Applied on 2.6.x and trunk. Jody should retag 2.6.1 in a few
hours before Mark starts wielding the release hammer.
Cheers
Andrea
As with any last minute change I think we are asking for trouble :), but
in this case the reward seems worth the risk. As long as we can throw
out another release quickly, (or path the release) in case a serious
regression does pop up I see no issue.
2c.
-Justin
ps. Was this meant for geoserv
Ciao Andrea,
looked it up quickly, sounds more than reasonable to me.
I would go ahead and apply it on as many branch as you can.
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Founder - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaior
Hi,
lately I was chatting with Gabriel about coverage rendering speed and
scalability issues and he suggested that SPI is a very significant
scalability problem, even when just wrapping the coverages into a
feature collection for rendering purposes.
In fact the attached patch makes it so that t
