Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-24 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Richard Gould a écrit : hmm - that worked. I get the correct output. Cool! Checking the built zip file, it looks like only the javadocs for gt/module were built. For the release, don't we want all javadocs to be in the javadoc zip file? This is very easy to adjust. We just need to agree on

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-24 Thread Richard Gould
hmm - that worked. I get the correct output. I then executed mvn org.geotools:gt2-javadoc:javadoc on trunk and it worked! (note that I have not done an svn update since I last tried, so it seems mvn install in gt/maven/javadoc did the trick, which is odd, because I tried that before!) Tryi

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-21 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Richard Gould a écrit : Do you get the same exception when running "mvn install" and "mvn org.geotools:gt2-javadoc:javadoc" both on trunk? Yeah, I get the same exception on trunk. Am I missing something? Not necessarly, it is likely to be a bug in the custom plugin. When invoking "mvn insta

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-19 Thread Richard Gould
Yeah, I get the same exception on trunk. Am I missing something? Martin Desruisseaux wrote: Martin Desruisseaux a écrit : Do you get the same exception when running "mvn install" and "mvn org.geotools:gt2-javadoc:javadoc" both on trunk? (I mean on a fresh trunk checkout - I fixed a bug simi

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-19 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Added a wiki page about generating javadoc: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/2.6+Generating+Javadoc I noticed that a new maven-javadoc-plugin were released recently. I tried it, but some Maven plugins still have a number of bugs. For example: * upgrating maven-resources-plugin from 2.1

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-18 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Martin Desruisseaux a écrit : Do you get the same exception when running "mvn install" and "mvn org.geotools:gt2-javadoc:javadoc" both on trunk? (I mean on a fresh trunk checkout - I fixed a bug similar to this one a few days ago). Martin. ---

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-18 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Richard Gould a écrit : I tried a mvn install on trunk and then went to my 2.2-RC3 checkout. Executing mvn org.geotools:gt2-javadoc:javadoc yields this exception: [...snip...] [DEBUG] Trace java.lang.NullPointerException

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-18 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Cory Horner a écrit : At a glance it looked like: r19455 | rgould | 2006-05-11 13:57:44 -0700 (Thu, 11 May 2006) | 1 line [maven-release-plugin] prepare release 2.2-RC3 was responsible... but upon review, perhaps it was: r19418 | rgould | 2006-05-09 17:18:21 -0700 (Tue, 09 May 2006) | 1 line [

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-18 Thread Cory Horner
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: Richard Gould a écrit : The poms are changed whenever maven release:prepare is executed, but they do not change the formatting. I had a look at the diff for the commit and it just changes version numbers. Just checked. It is true that the poms are almost the same

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-18 Thread Jody Garnett
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: Richard Gould a écrit : The poms are changed whenever maven release:prepare is executed, but they do not change the formatting. I had a look at the diff for the commit and it just changes version numbers. Just checked. It is true that the poms are almost the same be

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-18 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Richard Gould a écrit : The poms are changed whenever maven release:prepare is executed, but they do not change the formatting. I had a look at the diff for the commit and it just changes version numbers. Just checked. It is true that the poms are almost the same between 2.2.x and 2.2-RC3. But

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-17 Thread Richard Gould
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: >> Does this create the javadoc zip archive that was normally generated >> during maven 1 createRelease? > > > Not yet, but it would be trivial to add (the plugin just execute an Ant > build file, so it is just a matter of adding a few lines to this Ant > build file - I

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-17 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Jody Garnett a écrit : If possible I would like to get a smaller javadoc of "module/*" - aka just the geotools library. Commited on trunk as of revision 19516. Our custom javadoc plugin now have 2 goals: mvn org.geotools:gt2-javadoc:javadoc - Generates javadoc for the whole Geotools

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-17 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Just realized that mvn org.geotools:gt2-javadoc:javadoc is implemented on trunk only. I tried to port it on 2.2 branch one or two week ago, but failed because the pom.xml files in the 2.2 branch are very different from the pom.xml files in the trunk. Was the pom.xml files overwritten by Ma

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-17 Thread Jody Garnett
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: I have documented the progress I have made so far: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOT/How+to+cut+a+release It's right at the top in the big blue box. Can we delete the Maven 1 specific instructions in the above page, and reformat the blue box as top-level text? I

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Richard Gould wrote: I have successfully built all of the release jars for 2.2-RC3 and they have been uploaded to maven.geotools.fr. Wow congrats! Thanks Richard this is very good news. The only part that remains is to have the release process construct the standard binary/src/javadoc archives

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-16 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Richard Gould a écrit : For now, cross-module javadoc is generated using the following custom plugin: mvn org.geotools:gt2-javadoc:javadoc Does this create the javadoc zip archive that was normally generated during maven 1 createRelease? Not yet, but it would be trivial to add (the plug

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-16 Thread Richard Gould
Martin Desruisseaux wrote: Richard Gould a écrit : I have successfully built all of the release jars for 2.2-RC3 and they have been uploaded to maven.geotools.fr. The only part that remains is to have the release process construct the standard binary/src/javadoc archives that we use for norma

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-16 Thread Richard Gould
Hmm actually I think I just succesfully built a source release. I was just confused and trying something silly before. I have go to now, so I will check it out tomorrow, and try your javadoc plug-in. Then everything should be done. Cheers Richard Richard Gould wrote: Martin Desruisseaux wr

[Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-16 Thread Richard Gould
I have successfully built all of the release jars for 2.2-RC3 and they have been uploaded to maven.geotools.fr. The only part that remains is to have the release process construct the standard binary/src/javadoc archives that we use for normal distribution. I have documented the progress I hav

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-16 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Richard Gould a écrit : I have successfully built all of the release jars for 2.2-RC3 and they have been uploaded to maven.geotools.fr. The only part that remains is to have the release process construct the standard binary/src/javadoc archives that we use for normal distribution. Thanks a lo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Maven 2 release progress

2006-05-16 Thread Richard Gould
Jody Garnett wrote: Richard Gould wrote: The only part that remains is to have the release process construct the standard binary/src/javadoc archives that we use for normal distribution. Um what does it build right now? Is it something we can distribute? It builds a bunch of jars and upload