Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (epsg-wt)

2009-05-17 Thread Jody Garnett
>> Once we have that H2 + zip file I believe there won't be any >> more reason to work off the epsg-wkt file... or I'm still >> missing something? (I mean, H2 + zip in classpath is not >> really perceived as a database, doesn't it?) That is my understanding as well; once we have H2+zip file then w

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (epsg-wt)

2009-05-17 Thread Christian Müller
Fine, I am with you Andrea Aime writes: > Christian Müller ha scritto: >> Notes about Module epsg/wkt >> I use it because I have an app using geotools and the epsg database has >> always no or incorrect boursa wolf parameters for Austria. So I have to >> add/correct the TOWGS84 clause to the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules removed (epsg-wt)

2009-05-17 Thread Andrea Aime
Christian Müller ha scritto: > Notes about Module epsg/wkt > I use it because I have an app using geotools and the epsg database has > always no or incorrect boursa wolf parameters for Austria. So I have to > add/correct the TOWGS84 clause to the wkt definitions. > The file based approach is the