I will go ahead with extension, but this actually hits on something I
have wanted to bring up lately, in that I think we are outgrowing our
current organization scheme. I will start a separate thread for this but
I think "extension" becoming the place where we are starting to put
everything is
Understood; when the parser is deemed ready I thought it would move to
library as well?
How about we place it in extensions (so we can get on with life) and
consider moving when the parser is ready...
Jody
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>>
>> I exte
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> I extensions or library? Extensions is getting a little heavy and non
> optional these days.
If we had to move them to library, what would be of the parser?
xsd-core in library, all the others in extensions?
I was suggesting extensions because of the tight bound between
I extensions or library? Extensions is getting a little heavy and non
optional these days.
Jody
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Hi,
>> quick mail to make some final checks on the modules
>> cleanup process.
>>
>> It seems to me all module re-assignm
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Hi,
>> quick mail to make some final checks on the modules
>> cleanup process.
>>
>> It seems to me all module re-assignments went well. Good!
>>
>> Moving wise, I think there was still on the place moving
>> the OGC EMF modules (unsupported/ogc
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> quick mail to make some final checks on the modules
> cleanup process.
>
> It seems to me all module re-assignments went well. Good!
>
> Moving wise, I think there was still on the place moving
> the OGC EMF modules (unsupported/ogc) to supported land.
> Justin? What wi
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Hi Andrea:
>
> Thanks for running this one along - some comments inline.
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>
>> I asked around, nobody is interested in making even light
>> maintenance on mif, geomedia, gml, gml3 and vpf.
>>
>> Yet, Camp2Camp confi
Hi Andrea:
Thanks for running this one along - some comments inline.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> I asked around, nobody is interested in making even light
> maintenance on mif, geomedia, gml, gml3 and vpf.
>
> Yet, Camp2Camp confirmed me they are using both the mif and
>
Hi,
quick mail to make some final checks on the modules
cleanup process.
It seems to me all module re-assignments went well. Good!
Moving wise, I think there was still on the place moving
the OGC EMF modules (unsupported/ogc) to supported land.
Justin? What will be of those modules?
And then the
