Hi Paul - catching up on a lot of email.
I will declare motion approved - and have updated the website to reflect
this. The proposal page tracking this is here:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Move+to+another+Server
Jody
BTW I appreciated your recent post on the longevity of funding
Hi PMC guys,
as far as I understood we should try and get on with either moving to
codehaus or moving to osgeo.
What should we do now? Should we start voting on these two options?
Simone.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Paul Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think someone on PSC has to decla
I think someone on PSC has to declare "motion approved" and then I'll
swing into motion on the OSGeo side.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Simone Giannecchini
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hy guys,
> just out of curiosity, where we are wt with this repo thing?
>
> Simone.
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 a
Hy guys,
just out of curiosity, where we are wt with this repo thing?
Simone.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Justin Deoliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with this Paul. As java folks we are already somewhat considered
> as lepers... going with our own svn solution like codehaus would
I agree with this Paul. As java folks we are already somewhat considered
as lepers... going with our own svn solution like codehaus would just
add fuel to the fire :)
-Justin
Paul Ramsey wrote:
> As an OSGeo project, you should really be using OSGeo
> infrastructure... there's not really a com
As an OSGeo project, you should really be using OSGeo
infrastructure... there's not really a compelling reason not to.
P.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Martin Desruisseaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrea Aime a écrit :
>>> Just a final chance to point out that codehaus is an option and wou
Andrea Aime a écrit :
>> Just a final chance to point out that codehaus is an option and would
>> minimize the amount of password stuff project members need to figure
>> out. Also the access to maven repo space is pretty sweet. I assume this
>> was discussed in the meeting - I will check the log
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Hi,
>> today during the meeting we were talking about moving
>> the svn repo to OSGEO. The late svn issues have
>> been taking most of us enough to consider the switch.
>>
>> During the meeting we gathered the following positive
>> votes already:
>>
Adrian Custer wrote:
> As a totally separate issue, we need to regain control of geotools.org.
> I was sick yesterday but I'll try to advance on that front today.
>
Thanks Adrian that was the one question I had for today meeting.
Jody
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> today during the meeting we were talking about moving
> the svn repo to OSGEO. The late svn issues have
> been taking most of us enough to consider the switch.
>
> During the meeting we gathered the following positive
> votes already:
> * aaime
> * groldan
> * jdeolive
>
Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> Hey all,
>
> If you want to move the repo, OSGeo is ready to host it. The transfer
> would require something like:
> 1. open a TRAC issue and probably notify the OSGeo admin group
> 2. schedule the transfer with refractions admin and osgeo
> 3. freeze the
Hey all,
If you want to move the repo, OSGeo is ready to host it. The transfer
would require something like:
1. open a TRAC issue and probably notify the OSGeo admin group
2. schedule the transfer with refractions admin and osgeo
3. freeze the repo
4. get a dump and get the lis
+1
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
> > It's enough positives to make it a decision, but on
> > such a move consensus is better.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> --
> Ben Caradoc-Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration
Andrea Aime wrote:
> It's enough positives to make it a decision, but on
> such a move consensus is better.
+1 from me.
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining
Australian Resources Research Centre
26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> today during the meeting we were talking about moving
> the svn repo to OSGEO. The late svn issues have
> been taking most of us enough to consider the switch.
>
> During the meeting we gathered the following positive
>
Hi,
today during the meeting we were talking about moving
the svn repo to OSGEO. The late svn issues have
been taking most of us enough to consider the switch.
During the meeting we gathered the following positive
votes already:
* aaime
* groldan
* jdeolive
* simboss
It's enough positives to make
16 matches
Mail list logo
