Jody wrote: "Hey we fell off the development list again - that is not cool."
My bad. I keep forgetting to hit the "reply to all" button.
Jody wrote: "Call it a FeatureCollection then. I seem to recall Jump having a
FeatureType - indeed I reviewed it as a candidate for GeoTools."
JUMP has Feature
Hey we fell off the development list again - that is not cool.
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> This might be a little bit of a problem. OpenJUMP doesn't specify
> FeatureTypes.
Call it a FeatureCollection then. I seem to recall Jump having a
FeatureType - indeed I reviewed it as a candidate for GeoT
Just checked - on trunk it uses FeatureCollection.
public void runFeatureTests(String dsID, FeatureCollection collection,
ValidationResults results);
ValidationResults operates as a visitor in a manner similar to
TestResults in JUnit.
have fun,
Jody
> I've got some good news. I think I can ma
> I've got some good news. I think I can make use of the validation
> framework in some of my geomerty and spatial relationship validation
> work.
>
cool. There are lots of formal docs if you want them - talking about
what the files are and what operations were needed to be complete for
the f
I've got some good news. I think I can make use of the validation
framework in some of my geomerty and spatial relationship validation
work.
I've also got some bad news. I'm running into the FeatureModel problem again. :]
I think there are two approaches I could take:
[1] I can convert all of my
