Okay,
Martin is of the same opinion, which leaves us with the following
strategy:
license/
Has a copy of each license file plus the overall LICENSE we
apply to everything, i.e. almost all LGPL plus some details.
Each module must have:
site/.../review.apt
pom.xml
I am worried about duplication; a lot of the information you describe is
covered by the pom.xml file
> We need to agree on a layout of files. For isogeom, I've settled on:
>
> LGPL --- version 2.1 (i.e. a copy of each license applicable)
>
in the pom.xml
> LICENSE --- the actual text of th
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:16 +0200, Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Adrian Custer a écrit :
> > Standardizing the format and layout is probably a great idea.
> >
> > Moving it to an obscure location is likely to make module maintainers
> > even less likely to create, update and maintain that file.
>
Adrian Custer a écrit :
> Standardizing the format and layout is probably a great idea.
>
> Moving it to an obscure location is likely to make module maintainers
> even less likely to create, update and maintain that file.
Well, the problem is that if we want to integrate the review in the Maven
Standardizing the format and layout is probably a great idea.
Moving it to an obscure location is likely to make module maintainers
even less likely to create, update and maintain that file.
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 22:52 +0200, Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> At last IRC meeting, it has been propose
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> At last IRC meeting, it has been proposed to include the review document into
> the page generated by "mvn site:site". For this purpose, I would like to move
> every review.txt file (currently at the root of each module) to the following
> location:
>
> /sr
Go for it martin; I also consider the doc folder but by maven manners
are a bit rusty. The APT format is pretty cool.
Jody
> At last IRC meeting, it has been proposed to include the review document into
> the page generated by "mvn site:site". For this purpose, I would like to move
> every revi
At last IRC meeting, it has been proposed to include the review document into
the page generated by "mvn site:site". For this purpose, I would like to move
every review.txt file (currently at the root of each module) to the following
location:
/src/site/apt/review.apt
"apt" stands for "Alm
