Ben,
I'm glad to hear that. Thank you!
Maciej
W dniu 04.06.2016 o 07:44, Ben Caradoc-Davies pisze:
> Maciej,
>
> I thought you might like to know that I have just submitted pull
> requests to add support for your Rotated Pole projection to the GeoTools
> NetCDF module and the GeoServer
Maciej,
I thought you might like to know that I have just submitted pull
requests to add support for your Rotated Pole projection to the GeoTools
NetCDF module and the GeoServer NetCDF output module:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1205
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/1631
Maciej,
that looks great. I agree that this new projection is the best way to
maintain backwards compatibility. In the test script, for "source pt =
(0, 0)", the "target pt" latitude matches the projection
latitude_of_origin, as I expect for a Rotated Pole projection.
I repurposed my Jira
Ben,
in order not to break API, I propose to add new transformation first
(named RotatedPole) with this PR:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1168
and then remove (by depreciation?) the GeneralOblique one. This should
be safer because of somehow "fundamental" change in one of the key
On 05/04/16 08:27, Maciej Filocha wrote:
> W dniu 02.04.2016 o 02:34, Ben Caradoc-Davies pisze:
>> I have created a Jira issue for this problem:
>> [GEOT-5396] Incorrect General Oblique transform
>> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5396
> I'll prepare fix for it this week.
Thanks very
Ben,
W dniu 02.04.2016 o 02:34, Ben Caradoc-Davies pisze:
> I have created a Jira issue for this problem:
>
> [GEOT-5396] Incorrect General Oblique transform
> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5396
I'll prepare fix for it this week.
>
> One other question: is General_Oblique the most
Maciej,
I have created a Jira issue for this problem:
[GEOT-5396] Incorrect General Oblique transform
https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5396
One other question: is General_Oblique the most appropriate name for
this MapProjection? Although the implementation methods could be used be
Maciej,
thank you for your contribution of the General Oblique Transform to
GeoTools.
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/library/referencing/src/main/java/org/geotools/referencing/operation/projection/GeneralOblique.java
https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5190
Ben,
W dniu 18.03.2016 o 03:49, Ben Caradoc-Davies pisze:
> I note that (lambda_g^N, phi_g^N) is the North Pole of the rotated grid,
> so phi_g^N is not latitudeOfOrigin, which is measured from the equator.
You're right here. Proj's "+o_lat_p" parameter (undocumented, of course)
used in my
Maciej,
I am looking at equations 3.74 on page 25 (PDF page 31) of part one of
the COSMO manual:
http://www.cosmo-model.org/content/model/documentation/core/cosmoDyncsNumcs.pdf
I note that (lambda_g^N, phi_g^N) is the North Pole of the rotated grid,
so phi_g^N is not latitudeOfOrigin, which is
10 matches
Mail list logo
