> So yeah, while WPS per se is still not ready for GeoServer core
> (over my dead body as long as it lacks of service limits and ability
> to hide processes),
>
>
Agreed.
> the process API looks like something we can commit to once these
> fixes are in.
>
>
That would make me cheerful / moti
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> So this is what you were talking about with respect to the "process stuff
> not being ready".
Err... just part of it. When I said it all we had were some sample processes,
now we have more and I know other people have been implementing extras
So this is what you were talking about with respect to the "process stuff not
being ready".
Okay lets get cracking; I don't want to commit to a stable until you are
sorted….
> writing processes over and over let me to see some deficiencies in the
> WPS annotations that
> I would like to clear o
