Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal, adding vendor option support to Rule

Thanks to all that voted here on the list, or directly on the proposal. Not all votes have been cast, but according to our procedures "proposal is accepted ‘automatically’ within 15 days (unless objections are raised )" With

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal, adding vendor option support to Rule

+1 On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:24 AM Simone Giannecchini < simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > +0 > > Regards, > Simone Giannecchini > == > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! > Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information. > == > Ing. Simone Giannecchini >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal, adding vendor option support to Rule

+0 Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax:

[Geotools-devel] Proposal, adding vendor option support to Rule

Hi all, I have written a quick proposal to add vendor options to rules, since it's an API change: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Vendor-options-options-map-for-rules Cheers Andrea == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. ==