Sorry for the late vote, +1.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Simone Giannecchini
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it wrote:
Ciao Andrea,
I tried to put my +1 on the page but it looks like I can't log in.
I'll try to reset the pwd, but, yeah, this is a +1.
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
+1 here, sounds awesome.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Justin Deoliveira jdeol...@opengeo.orgwrote:
Sorry for the late vote, +1.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Simone Giannecchini
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it wrote:
Ciao Andrea,
I tried to put my +1 on the page but it
+1. Looks good to me. This change should be fine on master.
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 07/04/13 22:22, Andrea Aime wrote:
Hi all,
here is a proposal to upgrade the shapefile-ng module to supported
status, and make shapefile become (temporarily) an unsupported module
named shapefile-old:
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Andrea Aime andrea.a...@geo-solutions.itwrote:
Hi all,
here is a proposal to upgrade the shapefile-ng module to supported status,
and make shapefile become (temporarily) an unsupported module named
shapefile-old:
Ciao Andrea,
I tried to put my +1 on the page but it looks like I can't log in.
I'll try to reset the pwd, but, yeah, this is a +1.
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer training in Milan, 6th 7th June 2013! Visit
http://geoserver.geo-solutions.it for more information.
==
Ing. Simone
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to provide word from uDig - we already use shapefile-ng in order
to take advantage of sorting.
I have filled in a few tasks on your proposal (to specific code examples
needing updating).
Ah, sorry, I
Hi all,
here is a proposal to upgrade the shapefile-ng module to supported status,
and make shapefile become (temporarily) an unsupported module named
shapefile-old:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Migrate+shapefile+to+shapefile-ng
and here is the pull request:
I tried to provide word from uDig - we already use shapefile-ng in order to
take advantage of sorting.
I have filled in a few tasks on your proposal (to specific code examples
needing updating).
Thoughts:
- tempted to introduce matching constructors, and marking them deprecated to
give
