[Geotools-devel] Re: [Geoapi-devel] Features and CRS

2006-05-17 Thread Jody Garnett
Justin Deoliveira wrote: So what I am getting is that the data is the authority, where as the type is more like a recipe. And we respect aggregation in that something that is contained by another and defines a CRS overrides the containers CRS. Sounds like you got it, note that the for a "valid"

[Geotools-devel] Re: [Geoapi-devel] Features and CRS

2006-05-17 Thread Justin Deoliveira
So what I am getting is that the data is the authority, where as the type is more like a recipe. And we respect aggregation in that something that is contained by another and defines a CRS overrides the containers CRS. -Justin Jody Garnett wrote: Justin Deoliveira wrote: Hi all, Looking at

[Geotools-devel] Re: [Geoapi-devel] Features and CRS

2006-05-16 Thread Jody Garnett
Justin Deoliveira wrote: Hi all, Looking at new feature model I must admit I am confused as to where I should get CRS info from since there are multiple choices. Given a feature I can look up a CRS with: Missed one (and adjusted your names to reflect class): 0. Geometry.getCRS() - this is opt