On 27 March 2010 18:35, Andrea Aime wrote:
> I see your point. Let me explain mine:say you are using point
> symbolizer to stick a pie chart on top of that multipolygon using
> the gt-chart module. How many charts per state do you want? :-)
>
A good (ahem) point :-)
> How should we call it? "Labe
Michael Bedward ha scritto:
> At the risk of spec heresy I don't think it makes any sense to plot a
> single point for a MultiPolygon which has disjunct parts. Any way of
> implementing it, such as point in largest component polygon, is
> arbitrary.
>
> It seems more natural, and much more useful
ASFAIK, the centorid of geometry is not guaranteed to be within the
geometry. As an example, s simple Polygon with a shape like the letter "U"
has its centroid not on the surface.
There is a operation "pointOnSurface" you should use.
For multipolygons, I use an additional Multipoint geometry ini
At the risk of spec heresy I don't think it makes any sense to plot a
single point for a MultiPolygon which has disjunct parts. Any way of
implementing it, such as point in largest component polygon, is
arbitrary.
It seems more natural, and much more useful, to draw the centroid for
each componen
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi,
> I was looking at a specific issue making maps with
> both point a polygon symbolizers.
> One such map is attached as an example.
>
> The map contains a single geometry, a multipolygon
> representing the state of California.
> As you can
Hi,
I was looking at a specific issue making maps with
both point a polygon symbolizers.
One such map is attached as an example.
The map contains a single geometry, a multipolygon
representing the state of California.
As you can see the state has islands, each of them
covered by a point.
Now, I'm