Adrian Custer ha scritto:
> The JAXB question is more complex, raising the existence of the
> religious war that so tiringly rages in our midst. There are the two
> factions in Geotools, the eclipse sect and the sun fanatics. Neither can
> tolerate the technology of the other and both are too l
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Adrian Custer wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> The JAXB question is more complex, raising the existence of the
> religious war that so tiringly rages in our midst. There are the two
> factions in Geotools, the eclipse sect and the sun fanatics. Neither can
> tolerate the tec
Hi Adrian,
Please excuse this slight hijack of the topic, but there have been
mentions of eventually back-porting the new and beautiful code to work
against Java5. Do you have any feelings on how realistic that idea is
? My guess is that it's unlikely to happen for all of the usual, real
world r
Hello,
Jody has essentially answered you already but I'll add my take which may
flesh out the explanation.
The style specification evolved greatly from its earlier incarnation
which involved a fairly extensive re-design of the system in place.
During that work the author of the new style syste
Francisco Moura wrote:
> Srs.,
>
> I´m working on a project that is being built on top of Geotools.
>
> One of our demands is some advanced styles, and so, I´ve been studing
> the current 2.5.1 version implmentation and reading the upcoming
> modifications.
>
Update to 2.6 and you will see geo
Srs.,
I´m working on a project that is being built on top of Geotools.
One of our demands is some advanced styles, and so, I´ve been studing
the current 2.5.1 version implmentation and reading the upcoming
modifications.
I saw that you are creating a new MarkFactory and some other great
stuff
