Yup, this looks great to me.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
>
>> Its important to note that on the encoding side the type/element qname
>> declared by the binding is only used if there is type in the context whi
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Its important to note that on the encoding side the type/element qname
> declared by the binding is only used if there is type in the context which
> is often not there for encoding (think encoding a straight feature
> collection without
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
>> I see, so a generic binding for LineString that would then do some
>> typechecks and delegate to the proper
>>
>>> subclasses? My worry is, at that point, isn't the element used for
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> I see, so a generic binding for LineString that would then do some
> typechecks and delegate to the proper
>
>> subclasses? My worry is, at that point, isn't the element used for
>> encoding pretty much cast in stone?
>>
>
> Yeah, the bind
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
>>
>> Am I missing something? Having a CircularString extends MultiLineString
>>> and Ring extends LinearRing is
>>> not going to be the end of the world, but I'd like to see if there ar
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
> Am I missing something? Having a CircularString extends MultiLineString
>> and Ring extends LinearRing is
>> not going to be the end of the world, but I'd like to see if there are
>> better options.
>>
>> I also thought about some sort o
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Andrea Aime <
> andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
>
>> The GML2 model does not have any curved arc notion, so that's easy.
>> The GML3 model has a number instead:
>> * CircleByCenterPoint: this one we cannot
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> The GML2 model does not have any curved arc notion, so that's easy.
> The GML3 model has a number instead:
> * CircleByCenterPoint: this one we cannot represent as is with the work
> I'm going to do, but it could be turned into
> an equivale
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Do you see a chance to consolidate? It would be nice to use a single set
> of curve classes located in api or main and have the gml encoding work off
> of them.
>
Right, I'm going to look into it, but can make no promises.
The Circle cla
Micheal Bedward had a utility class for working with Curves (used in the docs
below). As such it can hold a method to generate curves in a consistent
fashion.
http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/jts/geometry.html#arcs-circles-and-curves
--
Jody Garnett
On Wednesday, 29 May 2
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
>
>> Sounds like a good approach to me. So to clarify, are you planning on
>> taking the Circle/Arc code from the gml3 module and putting that in the api
>> module?
>>
>
> Yes, and wr
As from Monday's meeting, there is a small detail on how to handle
linearization so that touching circular arcs line up.
If you just take a set number of steps (say 32) between your start and end
arc points you end up with situation shown. The "longer" arc will have
longer line segments (and not l
Yes, fine with me.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
>
>
> For the latter I've cc'ed Martin Davis. Martin, is it ok to make a copy of
> the WKBReader in GeoTools, keeping both the original copyright header and
> the GeoTools one? The license is the same.
>
>
---
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Sounds like a good approach to me. So to clarify, are you planning on
> taking the Circle/Arc code from the gml3 module and putting that in the api
> module?
>
Yes, and wrap it in a CircularString class that hides the circular nature
to
Sounds like a good approach to me. So to clarify, are you planning on
taking the Circle/Arc code from the gml3 module and putting that in the api
module?
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am looking into end-to-end support for circular arcs in GeoTools.
>
> The requir
Hi,
I am looking into end-to-end support for circular arcs in GeoTools.
The requirement would be to take a circular arc from the data source (SQL
Server 2012 in this case,
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff929141.aspx), and maintain the
data in its native form until it can be encoded in GM
16 matches
Mail list logo
