Re: [Geotools-devel] Updates to the Dev Guide procedures

Hi Andrea, Good catch on the gt-process dependency. This seems like it is something that can be resolved relatively easily, as the only actual dependency is in the gt-ysld test cases. It looks like the core ylsd code is designed in a way that can use gt-process without explicitly depending upon it

Re: [Geotools-devel] Updates to the Dev Guide procedures

> As part of the graduation I would consider checking if you can do without > that dependency (or graduate > the processing modules along with it, Jody had still something he wanted > to do before graduating them > I believe). > I would be game to look at this, I thought I was waiting on you befor

Re: [Geotools-devel] Updates to the Dev Guide procedures

Hey Torben, I just had my location geotools 15.4 build fail on gt-ysld because it depends on a process module, which is not in the build unless one adds -Dall. So... you cannot graduate the gt-ysld module in that state, as it would be a supported module depending on an unsupported one (and one not

Re: [Geotools-devel] Updates to the Dev Guide procedures

Thanks Torben, I had tried to kill all references to module matrix - apparently you got the remainder. -- Jody Garnett On 19 January 2017 at 15:38, Torben Barsballe wrote: > Hello All, > > I am working towards moving gt-ysld towards being a sup

[Geotools-devel] Updates to the Dev Guide procedures

Hello All, I am working towards moving gt-ysld towards being a supported module, and ran into a bunch of minor outdated procedures in the dev guide. Pull request with fixes here , feedback welcome. Torben ---