Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> If you revise the draft document on metadata that I sent you a while
> ago, you would see that we left space for nodata, offset and scale
> values for each band.
Yes I remember and we agree on that. But based on previous emails and on a look
to TransformCategory in
Ciao Martin,
I think I am not expressing my thoughts clearly or least the message
is not getting throug., Let me rephrase because I think our views are
closer than what's your perception of them.
--->My thoughts<
I am NOT suggesting to removeNoData values, scale and offset
values for the
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> Do not belive me, just check what the rest of the world is doing:
> -gdal
> -esri arcsde
> -grass
> -hdf
> -netcdf
At least NetCDF and HDF have the following attributes:
- scale
- offset
- nodata
This is even part of OGC specification: OGC-01-004: Grid Co
Ciao Martin,
please ignore the second email, the good one is the first one :-).
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Martin Desruisseaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> > As you might remember, I would like to separate the geophysics non
> > geophysics duality from the c
