Thanks, Rob. Good to have you back!
Kind regards,
Ben.
On 19/03/15 10:18, Rob Atkinson wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I have been lurking watching Geoserver like a fond grandparent now for a
> long time, and now perhaps going to be in a position to use it in anger
> again, so started playing with the la
Hey folks,
I have been lurking watching Geoserver like a fond grandparent now for a
long time, and now perhaps going to be in a position to use it in anger
again, so started playing with the latest release.
I just wanted to say how fabulous it is looking, (visually, technically and
support wise)
Managed to review, had a couple questions about ResourceInfo.getName() API.
I am on IRC if you want to quickly blast through this...
--
Jody Garnett
On 18 March 2015 at 13:47, Niels Charlier wrote:
> Yeah definitely.
>
>
> On 18-03-15 20:04, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
> Thanks Niels/Sampo - I had a
Yeah definitely.
On 18-03-15 20:04, Jody Garnett wrote:
Thanks Niels/Sampo - I had an action item to review the changes but
did not get to it.
I assume this change is of benefit to geoserver wfs cascade (and would
like to be included in the release?)
--
Jody Garnett
On 18 March 2015 at 08:
Thanks Niels/Sampo - I had an action item to review the changes but did not
get to it.
I assume this change is of benefit to geoserver wfs cascade (and would like
to be included in the release?)
--
Jody Garnett
On 18 March 2015 at 08:18, Niels Charlier wrote:
> Hello Sampo,
>
> Thank you for
Hello Sampo,
Thank you for your review and your comments, I have responded to them.
I hope we can push this commit through asap.
Kind Regards
Niels
On 13-03-15 15:01, Sampo Savolainen wrote:
Hi,
Sorry about the radio silence. I've been working on an unrelated big
project and I haven't had a
Hi,
Sorry about the radio silence. I've been working on an unrelated big
project and I haven't had a chance to focus on this. I agree that the
testing in wfs-ng has not been up to spec and I appreciate your effort in
getting that house in order. I had a quick look and found nothing really
wrong wi
Sampo,
Would you have the time to have a look at that? Or anyone else?
Kind Regards
Niels
On 28-02-15 19:16, Niels Charlier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a new patch ready to improve the wfs-ng tests. All of this was
> done with the purpose of creating test cases for the new WFS 2.0
> functionality.
>
Hi,
I have a new patch ready to improve the wfs-ng tests. All of this was
done with the purpose of creating test cases for the new WFS 2.0
functionality.
I thought the test directory in wfs-ng was such a terrible mess it
needed serious work first.
A summary of what happened in this commit:
1
