Re: [Geotools-devel] Wish to postdone epsg-factory work to Geotools 2.5

2007-07-02 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > Let me be explicit ... BufferedAuthorityFactory: > 1- acted as a decorator (wrapping an existing CRS Authority and offering >buffering on it) > 2- acted as a super class for a class that wanted to have a buffer > 3- acted as a "buffered" backpointer for a direct cr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Wish to postdone epsg-factory work to Geotools 2.5

2007-07-01 Thread jgarnett
Quoting Andrea Aime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Wondering... have things been done so that it's not possible > to use the old framework keeping the new one in parallel? Andrea it is the same framework. In terms of implementation I have decided not to patch up Martin's origional superclasses (they were

Re: [Geotools-devel] Wish to postdone epsg-factory work to Geotools 2.5

2007-07-01 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Just commited some changes which are mainly javadoc and code reformating (adding the missing copyright headers, adding missing @since javadoc tag), editing some comments, replaced tabulations by spaces in code). The only significant changes in the code itself was: 1) NullObjectCache, DefaultOb

Re: [Geotools-devel] Wish to postdone epsg-factory work to Geotools 2.5

2007-07-01 Thread Andrea Aime
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > Andrea Aime a écrit : >> Wondering... have things been done so that it's not possible >> to use the old framework keeping the new one in parallel? > > For now the old classes are kept relatively stable. But with the work > hapenning directly in the referencing mo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Wish to postdone epsg-factory work to Geotools 2.5

2007-07-01 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Andrea Aime a écrit : > Wondering... have things been done so that it's not possible > to use the old framework keeping the new one in parallel? For now the old classes are kept relatively stable. But with the work hapenning directly in the referencing module, we will have to choose one or the ot

Re: [Geotools-devel] Wish to postdone epsg-factory work to Geotools 2.5

2007-07-01 Thread Andrea Aime
Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > I would like that Geotools 2.4 branch contains the old EPSG factory > implementation with class renamed, but without the work on the way. Wondering... have things been done so that it's not possible to use the old framework keeping the new one in parallel? Imho a

[Geotools-devel] Wish to postdone epsg-factory work to Geotools 2.5

2007-07-01 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
I would like that Geotools 2.4 branch contains the old EPSG factory implementation with class renamed, but without the work on the way. Rational: * Current work on EPSG-factory seems to consist in a lot of copy and paste in every directions (referencing Pair inner class copied in metadata