Re: [Geotools-devel] beta progress

2016-02-25 Thread Jody Garnett
Tested, over to you Kevin for GWC release. -- Jody Garnett On 25 February 2016 at 19:27, Jody Garnett wrote: > For preflight testing: > > http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/15-beta/ > > > -- Site24x7 APM Insi

Re: [Geotools-devel] beta progress

2016-02-25 Thread Jody Garnett
For preflight testing: http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geotools/release/15-beta/ -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Moni

Re: [Geotools-devel] beta progress

2016-02-24 Thread Jody Garnett
I did - see subsequent email. On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:18 AM Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Jody, > > this did not make sense to me. PR 1122 is "[GEOT-5373]: fix GRIB > DiskCache setup-backport to 14.x" and I saw no mention of a > PropertyAccessor. Did you mean another PR? > > Kind regards, > Ben.

Re: [Geotools-devel] beta progress

2016-02-24 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Jody, this did not make sense to me. PR 1122 is "[GEOT-5373]: fix GRIB DiskCache setup-backport to 14.x" and I saw no mention of a PropertyAccessor. Did you mean another PR? Kind regards, Ben. On 24/02/16 23:40, Jody Garnett wrote: > - had to duck https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1122

Re: [Geotools-devel] beta progress

2016-02-24 Thread Jody Garnett
Sorry wrong one - had to duck https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1056 index creation -- Jody Garnett On 24 February 2016 at 02:40, Jody Garnett wrote: > As per meeting here is an update with how far I got. > > - geotools pull requests handled no surprises, well some shockingly old > svn

[Geotools-devel] beta progress

2016-02-24 Thread Jody Garnett
As per meeting here is an update with how far I got. - geotools pull requests handled no surprises, well some shockingly old svn examples in the build instructions - had to duck https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1122 as proposal has not been approved. Looking more closely at it I am confus