Re: [Geotools-devel] data access with generics example

On Friday 08 February 2008 09:52:26 pm Justin Deoliveira wrote: > I have not incorporated any of the stuff from my proposal as I thought > they were more or less seperated. I woudl rather we focus on that after > we nail down what to do with getting complex features on smoothly. yup, I'm rolling ba

Re: [Geotools-devel] data access with generics example

Justin Deoliveira wrote: > I have not incorporated any of the stuff from my proposal as I thought > they were more or less seperated. I woudl rather we focus on that > after we nail down what to do with getting complex features on smoothly. Okay sounds good; the reason I was asking. Jody > > Jody

Re: [Geotools-devel] data access with generics example

I have not incorporated any of the stuff from my proposal as I thought they were more or less seperated. I woudl rather we focus on that after we nail down what to do with getting complex features on smoothly. Jody Garnett wrote: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> That is not needed anymore, FeatureSource

Re: [Geotools-devel] data access with generics example

Andrea Aime wrote: > That is not needed anymore, FeatureSource has getFeatureReader in > the proposal (maybe in Justin's one) so it's enough Sweet; I just looked and it was not in justins spike - but I will see that is is added. Jody ---

Re: [Geotools-devel] data access with generics example

Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Thanks to both of you - reviewing now. > > Just to be clear - are we trying to make this reflect the final cut? Or > just to compare approaches... > > Questions along these lines: > - justin's request that getReader and getWriter be available a at the > Source / Store

Re: [Geotools-devel] data access with generics example

Thanks to both of you - reviewing now. Just to be clear - are we trying to make this reflect the final cut? Or just to compare approaches... Questions along these lines: - justin's request that getReader and getWriter be available a at the Source / Store level - andrea's request for getSource,

Re: [Geotools-devel] data access with generics example

Hi all, for your consideration: The other approach is spiked at both jdeolive's spike and mine introduce generics in the data access layer to cope with parametrization of arguments, since return types (featurereader et al) could be ea

Re: [Geotools-devel] data access with generics example

Right, forgot about those. And as a special gift just for you i also added: FeatureSource.accept( FilterVisitor, ProgressListener ); FeatureSource.accept( Filter, FilterVisitor, ProgressListener ); :) Jody Garnett wrote: > Sweet! Great work Justin ... > > A couple of questions; what happened to

Re: [Geotools-devel] data access with generics example

Justin Deoliveira wrote: > http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/trunk/spike/jdeolive/api/src/main/java/org/geotools/data/FeatureCollection.java > Correction: http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/trunk/spike/jdeolive/api/src/main/java/org/geotools/feature/FeatureCollection.java > * The update path to Fe

Re: [Geotools-devel] data access with generics example

Sweet! Great work Justin ... A couple of questions; what happened to the use of Name? - DataAccess.getNames(): List - DataAccess.getSchema( Name ) Jody - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Micr

[Geotools-devel] data access with generics example

Hi all, As per the data access irc breakout i have created a spike which employs the changes. The spike is available at: http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/trunk/spike/jdeolive Its a maven project so you can build it and load it into your ide if you wish. However you need to have a geotools trun