Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-coverage refactorings

Hi Simone, Daniele, List, Here is what we currently have for our proposal: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Refactor-ImageMosaic-for-extensibility. This is still is discussion phase, we'd like to hear your input :) Kind Regards Niels On 31-03-16 20:14, Niels Charlier wrote: I have

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-coverage refactorings

I am only catching up on email today, sorry for the delay. -- Jody Garnett On 31 March 2016 at 11:00, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Jody Garnett > wrote: > >> Catching up with the geotools codebase for a bit ... and I also owe >> Andrea an update from the gt-dem communi

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-coverage refactorings

I have looked at Daniele's PR (superficially) and it looks good, but I would expect a proposal is in order to move a lot of API from a plugin to a core module. As far as I can see, there is little or no overlap between the two bodies of work at the moment. I don't expect any issues there. Co

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-coverage refactorings

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Catching up with the geotools codebase for a bit ... and I also owe Andrea > an update from the gt-dem community module progress. > > I see we have two teams looking at refactoring functionality into > gt-coverage: > > Daniele: Your pull requ

[Geotools-devel] gt-coverage refactorings

Catching up with the geotools codebase for a bit ... and I also owe Andrea an update from the gt-dem community module progress. I see we have two teams looking at refactoring functionality into gt-coverage: Daniele: Your pull request #1131 Supporting vector footprints on GDAL plugin