Re: [Geotools-devel] ip review update

2013-09-12 Thread Jody Garnett
Just an update, managed to action most of the remaining questions. There is a pull request here for master: - https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/268 I am directly committing fixes to 9.0-M1 branch. I have a couple more items to go, and then should get "check in" status. A few things that

Re: [Geotools-devel] ip review update

2013-08-23 Thread Jody Garnett
> > So yeah I am going to think about this, but would expect a performance > shootout is needed before considering any of the above. > > Oh look a performance tests: - http://code.google.com/p/java-matrix-benchmark/ Jody -

Re: [Geotools-devel] ip review update

2013-08-23 Thread Jody Garnett
> *Units* > Basically drop-in search/replace as JScience donated code to JSR-275 > > There actually has been a useful development on the unit side of things > after JSR-275 did not make it. They have defined a common set of interfaces > (http://www.unitsofmeasurement.org) and several "unit" project

Re: [Geotools-devel] ip review update

2013-08-23 Thread Jody Garnett
On a related note the JDL/JRL license makes the use of JAI and ImageIO a trouble. I have had to make a request to treat both of these in the same manner as the JRE (a prerequisite exemption ). It is also really hard to download and install[2]. *imageio-core BSD fork[]1* In researching this I have

Re: [Geotools-devel] ip review update

2013-08-23 Thread Jody Garnett
Interesting list, one nice thing coming out of that is that the dimension of our matrices tends to be small. I did a quick search, as I am worried about the performance of JScience (just bias as I am sure it is a general purpose solution). Got a lit of alternatives: - JAMA: http://math.nist.g

Re: [Geotools-devel] ip review update

2013-08-23 Thread Andrea Aime
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Note a few of our dependencies are rather stale: >>> - vecmath - has gone GPL on us for later releases, and the exsisting JDL >>> / JRL make it not open source. >>> - JSR-275 - is dead >>> >>> I wonder if we can replace both of the above wit

Re: [Geotools-devel] ip review update

2013-08-23 Thread Jody Garnett
> > Note a few of our dependencies are rather stale: >> - vecmath - has gone GPL on us for later releases, and the exsisting JDL >> / JRL make it not open source. >> - JSR-275 - is dead >> >> I wonder if we can replace both of the above with JScience? >> > > Don't know. Have you looked into it? Is

Re: [Geotools-devel] ip review update

2013-08-22 Thread Andrea Aime
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Note a few of our dependencies are rather stale: > - vecmath - has gone GPL on us for later releases, and the exsisting JDL / > JRL make it not open source. > - JSR-275 - is dead > > I wonder if we can replace both of the above with JScience?

Re: [Geotools-devel] ip review update

2013-08-22 Thread Jody Garnett
Note a few of our dependencies are rather stale: - vecmath - has gone GPL on us for later releases, and the exsisting JDL / JRL make it not open source. - JSR-275 - is dead I wonder if we can replace both of the above with JScience? Jody On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > E

[Geotools-devel] ip review update

2013-08-22 Thread Jody Garnett
Everything is answered, got a few clarifications on what to do next, thanks for the help this week everyone. Jody -- Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and AppDynamics. Performance Central is you