Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

I see; I was more thinking of the data package (and I thought we had ported more of it to the data module then that). In anycase I have just managed to to run mvn -Pextensive.tests,interactive.tests install So I am good to tag and release tomorrow morning. I will leave this email thread up if

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Data is a hodge-podge of things to help people implement and work > with DataStore/FeatureSource/FeatureStore; most of that is for > implementors but not all of it. What related stuff from main still > needs to be moved? (We moved a lot of it when we broke out data from >

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

Data is a hodge-podge of things to help people implement and work with DataStore/FeatureSource/FeatureStore; most of that is for implementors but not all of it. What related stuff from main still needs to be moved? (We moved a lot of it when we broke out data from main a couple years back). Jod

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

On 3/25/10 3:08 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Christian Müller ha scritto: >> I would like to see Andreas new Virtual Tables in the release, if it is >> possible. (this is not a MUST, it is a wish). >> >> @Andrea, I sent you a mail about 2.6.x and a proposal how to include the VT >> without having an af

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

Jody Garnett ha scritto: > So should I wait for this one? If it is only next week I don't mind > waiting ... Don't wait, go ahead. > I have also had an idea for "partitioning" a table based on a unique > attribute (the case where a table has a "subtype" attribute ... i > would like to offer a Fea

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

That would be fine Andrea; I am only testing PostGIS right now due to limited testing facilities. Jody On 25/03/2010, at 6:08 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Christian Müller ha scritto: >> I would like to see Andreas new Virtual Tables in the release, if it is >> possible. (this is not a MUST, it is

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

So should I wait for this one? If it is only next week I don't mind waiting ... I have also had an idea for "partitioning" a table based on a unique attribute (the case where a table has a "subtype" attribute ... i would like to offer a FeatureStore wrapper rather then just the FeatureSource wra

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

Works for me, I will play the "early adopter". Again, I want to state that this is a significant enhancement, avoiding creation of tons of SQL views :-) Andrea Aime writes: > Christian Müller ha scritto: >> I would like to see Andreas new Virtual Tables in the release, if it is >> possibl

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

Christian Müller ha scritto: > I would like to see Andreas new Virtual Tables in the release, if it is > possible. (this is not a MUST, it is a wish). > > @Andrea, I sent you a mail about 2.6.x and a proposal how to include the VT > without having an affect to the GeoServer GUI. The programmati

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

Christian Müller ha scritto: > I would like to see Andreas new Virtual Tables in the release, if it is > possible. (this is not a MUST, it is a wish). > > @Andrea, I sent you a mail about 2.6.x and a proposal how to include the VT > without having an affect to the GeoServer GUI. The programmati

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

Hey what do you think about the message I posted about the WMS 1.3.0 stuff a few days ago (see gt-wms1.3.0_CRS.patch in 'WMS 1.3.0 getMap request with SRS instead of CRS Parameter' thread) Plea

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

Hmmm what about the jdbc-ng datastores.? Jody Garnett writes: > When your train cars show up? All the issues that troubled uDig from > GeoTools 2.6.2 are now fixed. > > Jody > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Michael Bedward > wrote: >> Hi Jody, >> >> I've got a couple. When is the trai

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

I would like to see Andreas new Virtual Tables in the release, if it is possible. (this is not a MUST, it is a wish). @Andrea, I sent you a mail about 2.6.x and a proposal how to include the VT without having an affect to the GeoServer GUI. The programmatic API is enough for the moment and I c

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

When your train cars show up? All the issues that troubled uDig from GeoTools 2.6.2 are now fixed. Jody On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Michael Bedward wrote: > Hi Jody, > > I've got a couple. When is the train leaving ? > > Michael > ---

Re: [Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

Hi Jody, I've got a couple. When is the train leaving ? Michael -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for para

[Geotools-devel] release train for 2.6.3

So another month; another release ... Is there any pending fixes (or features?) that would like to make it in to a 2.6.3 release? -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compi