The additions are a few things I could not guess when doing my style
review for 2.6.x (one of them is uncommenting a method I had penciled
in for this work). The style factories for example do not need to be
changed to make this work.
I am content with the changes being back ported.
Jody
On Tue,
agreed.
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Founder - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584983027
fax: +39 0584983027
mob:+39 333 8128928
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://
I take it all the additions to the symbolizer api are additive? I would
think (I could be wrong) that udig is a special case in that it has
actually implemented the symbolizer interfaces directly. Imo the risk of
breaking existing code is worth the reward on this one.
2c.
Andrea Aime wrote:
>
Ciao Andrea,
on my side there are no objections about backporting this, actually I
am in favor of this since I might be using in a few installations.
Let' see what the others think about this backport.
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolu
