Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Can you be more specific about what exactly kind of api has to change? I
> think any additions are fine sicne I can't really see those interfaces
> being implemented by client code. But any other changes would seem
> strange after 2.6.0 has already been released.
Can you be more specific about what exactly kind of api has to change? I
think any additions are fine sicne I can't really see those interfaces
being implemented by client code. But any other changes would seem
strange after 2.6.0 has already been released.
Jody Garnett wrote:
> The back port i
The back port is okay; the StyleFactory interface was set up with this
"extension" in mind. Indeed I was trying to contact you about this one
as 2.6.0 was going out ...
Jody
On 06/11/2009, at 9:35 PM, andrea aime wrote:
> Hi,
> during the first day of code sprint at FOSS4G 2009
> I sat down
