Hi Ian,
that sounds like a job for unsupported modules, but having a module for
just one class seems overkill.
Maybe we could create a "playground" module? "skunkworks"? Whatever name is
fine to me.
Cheers
Andrea
Il ven 5 apr 2019, 09:25 Ian Turton ha scritto:
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 07:29,
On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 at 07:29, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> while working on the deprecation removal branch I stumbled
> into CachingFeatureSource I shared
> that class as an example years ago, was put among library code anyways
> against my suggestion
> and got a deprecation and a warning soundi