[Geotools-devel] geotools-webdav maven repository down

2011-09-30 Thread Frank Gasdorf
Hello, I'm wondering whether the http://download.osgeo.org/webdav/geotools is available. My continuous integration build fails because the repository is't accessible. Who can maintain the server and bring it back online? Cheers, Frank --

Re: [Geotools-devel] geotools-webdav maven repository down

2011-09-30 Thread Michael Bedward
It seems ok from here right now. You can also try http://download2.osgeo.org/webdav/geotools/ which is sometimes up when the other one is down. Michael On 30 September 2011 20:01, Frank Gasdorf wrote: > Hello, > I'm wondering whether the http://download.osgeo.org/webdav/geotools is > available

[Geotools-devel] Geotools/GeoServer stable release next week? Maybe Monday?

2011-09-30 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, it's been a while since the last stable release of GeoTools/GeoServer, I'd like to make one next week. Actually, I might have a window this Monday, would it be too soon? Let me know. Cheers Andrea -- --- Ing. Andrea Aime GeoSolutions S.A.S

[Geotools-devel] Simplifying the GeoTools/GeoServer releases

2011-09-30 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, one thing that has been bothering me for a while is the time it takes to make a release of the two projects out of the stable series, I normally have to spend 4 hours to make it. The current situation, with the cite tests running every night, is certainly better than it was once, but there is

Re: [Geotools-devel] [udig-devel] geotools-webdav maven repository down

2011-09-30 Thread Jody Garnett
Hello! There has been trouble with it on and off all day. If you ever need help go to the IRC channel #osgeo and ask. There is also a formal issue tract for "Systems Administration Committee" here: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/SAC It has contact details; issue tracker and so on. Indeed if I was

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs 2.0 work coming home

2011-09-30 Thread Jody Garnett
Yay! Let me know if you need any help. > * PropertyIsNil > > Filter (FES) 2.0 adds a new filtering construct named PropertyIsNil. To be > honest I am still a bit fuzzy on what this is actually supposed to do. > However I did get some clarification from wfs-dev list: > > > assume you have a

Re: [Geotools-devel] Simplifying the GeoTools/GeoServer releases

2011-09-30 Thread Jody Garnett
> The current situation, with the cite tests running every night, is certainly > better > than it was once, but there is still a lot of work to do, and that work has to > be done by someone that has all the keys to the project administration areas. > > > In a perfect world the maven release ta

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotools/GeoServer stable release next week? Maybe Monday?

2011-09-30 Thread Jody Garnett
I think that would be fine; it sounds like we may make a milestone release next week as well (when mbedward is ready). If so it would be nice to send out a double anouncement. Let me know if you need a hand. -- Jody Garnett On Friday, 30 September 2011 at 8:25 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs package reorg?

2011-09-30 Thread Gabriel Roldan
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: >> Hi Gabriel: >> I have been untangling a build failure in uDig where it cannot find >> org.geotools.xml.wfs >> I am going to guess this is related to your recent change: >> - http://hudson

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs package reorg?

2011-09-30 Thread Jody Garnett
That is great! We were just surprised when things broke. > I've been working on a branch fixing some odd bugs related to > authentication and filter encoding, but as a bonus I've ported the wfs > 1.1 datastore to ContentDataStore which has been a pleasure I have to > say, and we'll finally have tr

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs package reorg?

2011-09-30 Thread Gabriel Roldan
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > That is great! We were just surprised when things broke. > > I've been working on a branch fixing some odd bugs related to > authentication and filter encoding, but as a bonus I've ported the wfs > 1.1 datastore to ContentDataStore which has

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3872) Expose the WMS layer cascaded attribute

2011-09-30 Thread JIRA
Expose the WMS layer cascaded attribute --- Key: GEOT-3872 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3872 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Components: wms extension Affects Versions

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs 2.0 work coming home

2011-09-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Yay! Let me know if you need any help. > Thanks jody. > > * PropertyIsNil > > Filter (FES) 2.0 adds a new filtering construct named PropertyIsNil. To be > honest I am still a bit fuzzy on what this is actually supposed to do. > However I di

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotools/GeoServer stable release next week? Maybe Monday?

2011-09-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
That will work... however we are currently working on some inspire related fixes for wms 1.3.0 and the client would like an official release of it relatively soon. The deadline is Oct 21st... so +1 on a release now/Monday if people don't mind a new release popping up a few weeks later. The fixes i

Re: [Geotools-devel] Simplifying the GeoTools/GeoServer releases

2011-09-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Yeah I think a new hudson job on the build server could do all of this and automate pretty everything minus the announcements. Basically the input would simply be a release number and a revision. The job would tag, build, update version numbers, etc... It is definitely a fair bit of scripting work

Re: [Geotools-devel] Simplifying the GeoTools/GeoServer releases

2011-09-30 Thread Andrea Aime
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Yeah I think a new hudson job on the build server could do all of this and > automate pretty everything minus the announcements. Basically the input > would simply be a release number and a revision. The job would tag, build, > update ver

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotools/GeoServer stable release next week? Maybe Monday?

2011-09-30 Thread Andrea Aime
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > That will work... however we are currently working on some inspire related > fixes for wms 1.3.0 and the client would like an official release of it > relatively soon. The deadline is Oct 21st... so +1 on a release now/Monday > if people

[Geotools-devel] more on extended operators

2011-09-30 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi all, Expanding on the previous thread about extended operators. So I like the idea of not rolling out a new interface and just use functions like we have, basically making extended operators syntactic sugar for functions. The only potential roadblock is that function names are not namespace qua

Re: [Geotools-devel] Simplifying the GeoTools/GeoServer releases

2011-09-30 Thread Michael Bedward
On 1 October 2011 02:50, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Which brings me to a related point, i would like to commit all the hudson > scripts into svn... there is a lot of logic there and currently it is just > sittin gon the build server unversioned. > That's a great idea Justin. It would be nice to h

[Geotools-devel] wms and httpclient

2011-09-30 Thread Jody Garnett
Cool; I have not caught up to Jira since foss4g so thanks for brining discussion here. So the main thing here is the introduction of commons http client. I have worked with it in the past and don't mind it; but would rather be removing dependencies then adding them. If we had talked earlier

Re: [Geotools-devel] more on extended operators

2011-09-30 Thread Jody Garnett
Go for Name across the board; we also may have interpretability between Functions and Process; and it would also benefit from use of the qualified Name. I don't think introducing Name would be much of a trouble since the current Functions would just used as is; without a namespace. -- Jody