Thanks - Jesse was messing with the label rendering code and wanted
feedback.
"didn't run" counts as feedback ... by did not run do you mean it
produced an exception? Or just that no labels showed up?
If it helps you can use a PointSymbolizer and a TextSymbolizer in order
to check that renderi
Hi Jody,
My soultion is to enclose only the canProcess() in a try-catch block,
and save the result of it in a boolean variable. Then decide wether a
factory can handle a specific db based on the value of this boolean. But
a few lines of code tells more than tousand words:
while (ps.hasNext()
Hi Rob - do you need anything else to get up to supported status?
- encouragement? seems you have that
- user documentation? even a page?
- online tests? This one took me a while but I cleaned up the docs now.
Cheers,
Jody
Rob Atkinson wrote:
> Hi - I maintain the geometryless module, and its wor
Thanks Peter - or rather good "catch"
Can you cut and paste the modified code for me? I would be happy to
review and think about this change.
We do have a common problem where data store implementors say they
canProcess, but then they really cannot. This has resulted in a very
unhappy GeoServer
w2y4m wrote:
> Can anyone explain why the geometryless plugin has been moved to the
> unsuporrted modules in the current geotools trunk. Is this solely a
> short term decision due to the current stability
> which may later be revoked or are there plans to displace it by another
> module/plugin.
Hi Jody,
I was getting blank images, but have solved the problem with help from
my colleague Paul Townend who has already been through this.
The method createPNGImage(MapContext,int,int,String) as below generates
a PNG type image from MapContext theMapContext, this worked in the code
I original
Can anyone explain why the geometryless plugin has been moved to the
unsuporrted modules
in the current geotools trunk. Is this solely a short term decision due to
the current stability
which may later be revoked or are there plans to displace it by another
module/plugin.
If the latter is the case
Hello all,
This is a status document for the documentation stack of uDig. I've
spammed the other lists for anyone searching the archives. Please
respond on udig-devel list.
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 15:50 -0400, Peter N. Schweitzer wrote:
> But like this list, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", I'll point out that
