Fantastic,
I've been looking for an excuse to move to GeoTools 2.5 anyway.
Cleaning up the jarfile will buy us some time until I can push
out a new, 2.5-based codebase.
Thanks for the info
Matthew D. Diez
-Original Message-
From: Jody Garnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 9/15/200
I see.
The first version of GeoTools that supports Java 5 (and thus can even be
considered for JScience) is GeoTools 2.5.x please try the most recent
milestone. We will not be patching GeoTools 2.4.x to avoid conflicts
with JScience (my understanding is the JSR-102.jar we use for GeoTools
2.4
As it turns out, there's a number of incompatible interfaces in JScience
4.3.1, which I removed from the jarfile and got decent results.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Bedward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 7:12 PM
To: Diez, Matthew; geotools-gt2-users@lis
2008/9/15 Adrian Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I didn't understand the example which is why it was mysterious. As
> Michael Bedward just let slip in the question he asked, there is a whole
> parallel system based on 'DefaultProcessor' which Martin had nicely
> hidden from me since it is more comp
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 10:01 +0200, Simone Giannecchini wrote:
> Just a quick clarification about the CoverageCrop.
> There is nothing mysterious about such operation (at least for a poor
> enthusiastic developer like me).
> Such operations tries to crop a Coverage given a 2d envelope. It uses
> eit
Just a quick clarification about the CoverageCrop.
There is nothing mysterious about such operation (at least for a poor
enthusiastic developer like me).
Such operations tries to crop a Coverage given a 2d envelope. It uses either
the JAI crop or the JAI mosaic in case the latter is mroe convenient
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 09:03 +0200, Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Michael Bedward a écrit :
> > Reading the notes about operations from the perspective of a relative
> > beginner, it's not clear to me what the reasons / pros / cons are for
> > invoking an operation via Operations.DEFAULT (as with the
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 13:14 +1000, Michael Bedward wrote:
> This is great - thanks Adrian !
>
> I just had a very quick look and I've already learned something (that
> I don't have to go down to JAI level to do a crop).
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. That crop operation was floating around
from ea
Michael Bedward a écrit :
> Reading the notes about operations from the perspective of a relative
> beginner, it's not clear to me what the reasons / pros / cons are for
> invoking an operation via Operations.DEFAULT (as with the resample
> example on the Use a GridCoverage page) versus using the
>
