Different problem, I am worried about the classes with (c) vivid in our
postgis module, please see:
http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/trunk/gt/plugin/postgis/review.txt
Jody
> I raised this issue before and asked if it would cause any IP issues if
> we used a mofified version of the jar. My only r
I raised this issue before and asked if it would cause any IP issues if
we used a mofified version of the jar. My only response was from chris
saying that it should be fine.
-Justin
Jody Garnett wrote:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>>> Look guys the PostGIS WKB providence check
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>> Look guys the PostGIS WKB providence check also turned up some WKB
>> grief, I am expecting an answer from Chris or Justin on this.
>> Perhaps the solution to both problems can be considered at the same
>> time. JTS 1.7 also includes some WKB supp
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Look guys the PostGIS WKB providence check also turned up some WKB
> grief, I am expecting an answer from Chris or Justin on this.
> Perhaps the solution to both problems can be considered at the same
> time. JTS 1.7 also includes some WKB support - perhaps the depende
Look guys the PostGIS WKB providence check also turned up some WKB
grief, I am expecting an answer from Chris or Justin on this.
Perhaps the solution to both problems can be considered at the same
time. JTS 1.7 also includes some WKB support - perhaps the dependency
can be dropped.
Jody
> Hi gu
Do we have a wkb4j module? Like did we actually fork the existing wkb4j
yet? I'm not against doing so, as its been dead for years. It'd be
great if you could fix the tomcat deployment problems.
best regards,
Chris
Alessio Fabiani wrote:
Hi guys,
how about the WKB4J module? Did you remeber
